http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=AlexandraGalatescu 2026-04-19T16:03:04Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.25.6 http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Community:Different_types_of_relationships&diff=10237 2010-10-05T08:12:57Z

<p>AlexandraGalatescu: </p> <hr /> <div>{{TitleDescription Template<br /> |Title=Different types of relationships for ontology representation<br /> |Description=In real applications, we need a flexible ontology editor that helps the user represent taxonomies based on different types of relationships between concepts and with specific features, constraints and rules for each type of relationship. E.g., specialization (is-a) taxonomies, composition (part-whole) taxonomies, lists, etc. The reason is that some features for the specialization taxonomies (represented by the existing editors, e.g., the property inheritance) are not always appropriate for taxonomies based on other types of relationships.<br /> Also, the editor should be flexible enough to represent taxonomies based on new types of relationships and specific features, proposed by the user.<br /> Our solution for a project in progress was to build an editor that allows the user choose the type of taxonomy and that automatically applies the property inheritance only for the specialization taxonomies. For the composition taxonomies, the concept properties are inherited on demand. And for the list-like taxonomies the inheritance is applicable only for properties defined at the ontology level (inherited by all concepts). The editor is not yet flexible enough to help the user add taxonomies based on new relationship types and with features he needs for an application.<br /> }}<br /> {{Graphical representation}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue Template<br /> |Author=AlexandraGalatescu,<br /> |Domain=Ontology<br /> }}<br /> {{Additional information header}}<br /> <br /> {{My references}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue toolbar}}</div>

AlexandraGalatescu http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Community:Different_types_of_relationships&diff=10236 2010-10-05T08:11:40Z

<p>AlexandraGalatescu: </p> <hr /> <div>{{TitleDescription Template<br /> |Title=Different types of relationships for ontology representation<br /> |Description=In real applications, we need a flexible ontology editor that helps the user represent taxonomies based on different types of relationships between concepts and with specific features, constraints and rules for each type of relationship. E.g., specialization (is-a) taxonomies, composition (part-whole) taxonomies, lists, etc. The reason is that some features for the specialization taxonomies (represented by the existing editors, e.g., the property inheritance) are not always appropriate for taxonomies based on other types of relationships.<br /> Also, the editor should be flexible enough to represent taxonomies based on new types of relationships and specific features, proposed by the user.<br /> Our solution for a project in progress was to build an editor that allows the user choose the type of taxonomy and that automatically applies the property inheritance only for the specialization taxonomies. For the composition taxonomies, the concept properties are inherited on demand. And for the list-like taxonomies the inheritance is applicable only for properties defined at the ontology level (inherited by all concepts). The editor is not yet flexible enough to help the user add taxonomies based on new relationship types and with features he needs for an applications. <br /> }}<br /> {{Graphical representation}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue Template<br /> |Author=AlexandraGalatescu,<br /> |Domain=Ontology<br /> }}<br /> {{Additional information header}}<br /> <br /> {{My references}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue toolbar}}</div>

AlexandraGalatescu http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Community:Ontology-based_models&diff=9577 2010-04-16T06:54:14Z

<p>AlexandraGalatescu: </p> <hr /> <div>{{TitleDescription Template<br /> |Title=AlexandraGalatescu<br /> |Description=Patterns for building ontology-based models for applications, by inter-ontology relationships, constraints and rules. <br /> General patterns for inference and search on ontology-based models.<br /> }}<br /> {{Graphical representation}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue Template<br /> |Author=AlexandraGalatescu<br /> |Domain=Ontology-based modeling<br /> }}<br /> {{Additional information header}}<br /> <br /> {{My references}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue toolbar}}</div>

AlexandraGalatescu http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Community:Different_types_of_relationships&diff=9576 2010-04-16T06:51:34Z

<p>AlexandraGalatescu: </p> <hr /> <div>{{TitleDescription Template<br /> |Title=Different types of relationships for ontology representation<br /> |Description=The flexibility of the ontology editor to represent taxonomies based on different types of relationships between concepts and with specific features, constraints and rules for each type of relationship. E.g., specialization (is-a) taxonomies, composition (part-whole) taxonomies, lists, etc. The reason is that some features for the specialization taxonomies (represented by the existing editors, e.g., the property inheritance) are not always appropriate for taxonomies based on other types of relationships.<br /> Also, the editor flexibility to represent taxonomies based on new types of relationships and specific features.<br /> }}<br /> {{Graphical representation}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue Template<br /> |Author=AlexandraGalatescu,<br /> |Domain=Ontology<br /> }}<br /> {{Additional information header}}<br /> <br /> {{My references}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue toolbar}}</div>

AlexandraGalatescu http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Community:Different_types_of_relationships&diff=9575 2010-04-16T06:49:21Z

<p>AlexandraGalatescu: </p> <hr /> <div>{{TitleDescription Template<br /> |Title=Different types of relationships for ontology representation<br /> |Description=The flexibility of the ontology editor to represent taxonomies based on different types of relationships between concepts and with specific features, constraints and rules for each type of relationship. E.g., specialization taxonomies, composition taxonomies, lists, etc. The reason is that some features for specialization taxonomies (represented by the existing editors, e.g., property inheritance) are not appropriate for other types of taxonomies.<br /> Also, the editor flexibility to represent taxonomies based on new types of relationships and specific features.<br /> }}<br /> {{Graphical representation}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue Template<br /> |Author=AlexandraGalatescu,<br /> |Domain=Ontology<br /> }}<br /> {{Additional information header}}<br /> <br /> {{My references}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue toolbar}}</div>

AlexandraGalatescu http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Community:Ontology-based_models&diff=9574 2010-04-16T06:40:17Z

<p>AlexandraGalatescu: </p> <hr /> <div>{{TitleDescription Template<br /> |Title=AlexandraGalatescu<br /> |Description=Building ontology-based models for applications, by inter-ontology relationships, constraints and rules. <br /> Inference and search on ontology-based models.<br /> }}<br /> {{Graphical representation}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue Template<br /> |Author=AlexandraGalatescu<br /> |Domain=Ontology-based modeling<br /> }}<br /> {{Additional information header}}<br /> <br /> {{My references}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue toolbar}}</div>

AlexandraGalatescu http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Community:Ontology-based_models&diff=9573 2010-04-16T06:38:56Z

<p>AlexandraGalatescu: New page: {{TitleDescription Template |Title=AlexandraGalatescu |Description=Building ontology-based models for applications, by inter-ontology relationships, constraints and rules. Inference and s...</p> <hr /> <div>{{TitleDescription Template<br /> |Title=AlexandraGalatescu<br /> |Description=Building ontology-based models for applications, by inter-ontology relationships, constraints and rules. <br /> Inference and search on ontology-based models. <br /> }}<br /> {{Graphical representation}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue Template}}<br /> {{Additional information header}}<br /> <br /> {{My references}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue toolbar}}</div>

AlexandraGalatescu http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Community:Different_types_of_relationships&diff=9572 2010-04-16T06:27:35Z

<p>AlexandraGalatescu: </p> <hr /> <div>{{TitleDescription Template<br /> |Title=Different types of relationships for ontology representation<br /> |Description=The flexibility of the ontology editor to represent taxonomies based on different types of relationships between concepts and with specific features, constraints and rules for each type of relationship. E.g., specialization taxonomies, composition taxonomies, lists, etc. The reason is that some features for specialization taxonomies (represented by the existing editors, e.g., property inheritance) are not appropriate for other types of taxonomies.<br /> Also, the editor flexibility to add taxonomies based on new types of relationships.<br /> }}<br /> {{Graphical representation}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue Template<br /> |Author=AlexandraGalatescu, <br /> |Domain=Ontology<br /> }}<br /> {{Additional information header}}<br /> <br /> {{My references}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue toolbar}}</div>

AlexandraGalatescu http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Community:Different_types_of_relationships&diff=9571 2010-04-16T06:23:34Z

<p>AlexandraGalatescu: New page: {{TitleDescription Template |Title=Different types of relationships for ontology representation |Description=The flexibility of the ontology editor to represent taxonomies based on differe...</p> <hr /> <div>{{TitleDescription Template<br /> |Title=Different types of relationships for ontology representation<br /> |Description=The flexibility of the ontology editor to represent taxonomies based on different types of relationships between concepts and with specific features, constraints and rules for each type of relationship. E.g., specialization taxonomies, composition taxonomies, lists, etc. The reason is that some features for specialization taxonomies (represented by the existing editors, e.g., property inheritance) are not appropriate for other types of taxonomies.<br /> Also, the editor flexibility to add taxonomies based on new types of relationships.<br /> }}<br /> {{Graphical representation}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue Template}}<br /> {{Additional information header}}<br /> <br /> {{My references}}<br /> {{Modeling Issue toolbar}}</div>

AlexandraGalatescu