'Ontology Design Patterns' - User contributions [en]

Reviews:GerdGroener about Standard Enforcer Pattern

2012-08-30T08:29:48Z

GerdGroener: New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2012/8/30 |SubmittedBy=GerdGroener |ContentOPUnderReview=Standard Enforcer Pattern |RevisionID=11149 |Score=1 - needs minor revision |Re...

{{Content OP Proposal Review Template
|CreationDate=2012/8/30
|SubmittedBy=GerdGroener
|ContentOPUnderReview=Standard Enforcer Pattern
|RevisionID=11149
|Score=1 - needs minor revision
|ReviewSummary=Pattern Summary

The proposed pattern describes modelling guidelines
to describe a standard and the process that enforce the standard.

Evaluation of the Pattern

The pattern is useful and the example helps to understand the pattern.
I would suggest to elaborate the ontological presentation of the patter,
i.e., explain in more detail the modelling principles (in OWL) of the pattern
as depicted in Fig. 1.
Furthermore, Fig. 1 is not readable as some text is missing (not completely displayed).
Thus, for the final submission, both the Figure and the explanation of
the OWL-modelling principles have to be improved/added.

|ReviewConfidence=high
|ReviewProblems=As mentioned above, the presentation needs some improvements:
- Figure 1: Text is missing, some annotations are cut
- Explanation of modelling principles (Explain modelling and design decisions of the patters, i.e., explain the modelling rationale of Figure 1.
|ReviewRelevance=The pattern is relevant.
|ReviewReusability=The pattern is reusable.
|ReviewUnderstandability=The graphical representation (Figure 1) and the textual explanation of the pattern could be improved.
|ReviewClearProblem=The problem is clearly described.
|ReviewFigures=see comments above regarding Figure 1
}}

User:GerdGroener

2010-10-22T14:39:46Z

GerdGroener:

{{User Template
|FirstName=Gerd
|LastName=Groener
|Gender=Male
|Picture=ODPUser.png
|EmailAddress=groener@uni-koblenz.de
|HomePage=http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~groener
|Organization=University of Koblenz
|OrganizationType=Educational Training and Research Institution
|OrganizationWebSite=http://west.uni-koblenz.de
|Country=Germany (DE)
|Role=PhD Student
}}
{{Account Request Template
|Motivation=Collaboration with other researchers working on similar and relevant research topics.
|PossibleMainContribution=To have some help to solve modeling problems, To help other users to solve modeling problems
|DomainsOfInterest=Community:Workflow
|ExpertOfDomains=Software
|HowDidIKnowAbout=colleagues
}}
[[Category:EBMember]]

Reviews:GerdGroener about SimpleOrAggregated

2010-09-10T17:19:10Z

GerdGroener: New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/10 |SubmittedBy=GerdGroener |ContentOPUnderReview=SimpleOrAggregated |RevisionID=10097 |Score=2 - accept for certification |Revie...

{{Content OP Proposal Review Template
|CreationDate=2010/9/10
|SubmittedBy=GerdGroener
|ContentOPUnderReview=SimpleOrAggregated
|RevisionID=10097
|Score=2 - accept for certification
|ReviewSummary=The pattern describes a disjoint partition of objects into simple and aggregated objects that consist of at least two objects.

The proposed solution seems to be sound.
There is just one minor remark (see problems).

|ReviewConfidence=high
|ReviewProblems=I was a bit distracted by the terms "non-transitive fashion". What is non-transitive? Are the aggregated objects non-transitive connected? Is it relevant or why is it relevant?

This should be clarified in the final version
|ReviewRelevance=good
|ReviewBestPractice=good
|ReviewUnderstandability=See the comment above (Problems)
}}

Reviews:GerdGroener about Inverse n-ary relationship

2010-09-10T16:43:59Z

GerdGroener: New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/10 |SubmittedBy=GerdGroener |ContentOPUnderReview=Inverse n-ary relationship |RevisionID=10060 |Score=1 - needs minor revision |R...

{{Content OP Proposal Review Template
|CreationDate=2010/9/10
|SubmittedBy=GerdGroener
|ContentOPUnderReview=Inverse n-ary relationship
|RevisionID=10060
|Score=1 - needs minor revision
|ReviewSummary=The pattern extends (or restricts) the n-ary relationship pattern (Pattern1) from W3C. In the W3C pattern, the elements of the n-ary relation are non-distinguished. In this case, the inverse property means defining the inverse property of all properties.

The proposed pattern makes a simple, but from my point of view a quite restricting assumption. In the n-ary relation, there are two distinguishable elements and the ontology engineer is only interested of the inverse property of the property that connects this two elements.
The other elements are considered as optional.

Concerning this restriction, I doubt that this is really a n-ary relation! The focus is only on the relations between this two distinguishable elements. The others can be neglected.

|ReviewConfidence=high
|ReviewProblems=As already said, the main problem is that this is not really a n-ary relation.
|ReviewRelevance=high
|ReviewBestPractice=good
|ReviewReusability=borderline
|ReviewUnderstandability=Could be improved:

Firstly, I would use the same type of diagram as on the W3C page. Secondly, I suggest to give an example with a diagram for your pattern. Moreover, I would use one of the examples that are given on the W3C page.
|ReviewFigures=Could be improved (see above):
Give the example in the same representation style like on the web page of W3C.

}}

Submissions:Classification scheme - path enumeration model - to Taxonomy

2009-09-10T14:22:25Z

GerdGroener: Review has been created. Annotation 'assigned' has been removed.

{{Reengineering_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal General Information Template
|Name=Classification scheme - path enumeration model - to Taxonomy
|Problem=Re-engineering a classification scheme which follows the path enumeration model to design a taxonomy.
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal NOR Template
|Description=A non-ontological resource holds a classification scheme which follows the path enumeration model.
A classification scheme is a rooted tree of concepts, in which each concept groups entities by some particular degree of similarity. The semantics of the hierarchical relation between parents and children concepts may vary depending of the context.
The path enumeration data model for classification schemes take advantage of that there is one and only one path from the root to every item in the classification. The path enumeration model stores that path as string by concatenating either the edges or the keys of the classification scheme items in the path.
|Graphical Representation=PathEnumeration.png
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Ontology Template
|Description=The generated ontology will be based on the taxonomy architectural pattern (AP-TX-01). Each category in the classification scheme is mapped to a class, and the semantics of the relationship between children and parent categories are mapped to subClassOf relations.
|Graphical Representation=Ontology.png
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Process Template
|Description=1. Identify the classification scheme items whose their path enumeration values are equal to their key values, i.e. classification scheme items without parents.

2. For each one of the above identified classification scheme items cei:

2.1. Create the corresponding ontology class, Ci class.

2.2. Identify the classification scheme items, cej , which are children of cei, by using the path enumeration values.

2.3. For each one of the above identified classification scheme items cej :

2.3.1. Create the corresponding ontology class, Cj class.

2.3.2. Set up the subClassOf relation between Cj and Ci.

2.3.3. Repeat from step 2.2 for cej as a new cei.

3. If there are more than one classification scheme items without parent cei

3.1. Create an ad-hoc class as the root class of the ontology.

3.2. Set up the subClassOf relation between Ci class and the root class.
|Graphical Representation=Wfcspeso.png
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Scenario Example Template
|Description=Suppose that someone wants to build an ontology based on the International Standard Classification of Occupations (for European Union purposes) ISCO-88 (COM). This classification scheme follows the path enumeration data model.
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal NOR Example Template
|Description=The International Standard Classification of Occupations (for European Union purposes), 1988 version: ISCO-88 (COM) published by Eurostat is modeled with the path enumeration data model.
|Graphical Representation=PathEnumerationOccupations.png
|Web Reference=http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/nomenclatures/index.cfm? TargetUrl=LST_NOM&StrLanguageCode=EN&IntFamilyCode=260276&TxtSearch=
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Ontology Example Template
|Description=The generated ontology will be based on the taxonomy architectural pattern (AP-TX-01). Each occupation in the classification scheme is mapped to a class, and the semantics of the relationship between children and parent categories are mapped to subClassOf relations.
|Graphical Representation=OccupationsOntology.png
|Web Reference=http://droz.dia.fi.upm.es/hrmontology/
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Process Example Template
|Description=1. Create the LEGISLATORS, SENIOR OFFICIALS AND MANAGERS class.

2. Create the Legislators and senior officials class, and set up the sub-
ClassOf relation between the Legislators and senior officials class
and the LEGISLATORS, SENIOR OFFICIALS AND MANAGERS class.

3. Create the Corporate managers class, and set up the subClassOf relation
between the Corporate managers class and the LEGISLATORS, SENIOR
OFFICIALS AND MANAGERS class.

4. Create the PROFESSIONALS class.

5. Create the Occupation class.

6. Set up the subClassOf relation between the LEGISLATORS, SENIOR
OFFICIALS AND MANAGERS class and the Occupation class.

7. Set up the subClassOf relation between the PROFESSIONALS class and the
Occupation class.
|Graphical Representation=Wfcspesoexample.png
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Additional Information Template
|SubmittedBy=Boris Villazón Terrazas
|Author=Boris Villazón Terrazas
|Also known as=Classification scheme - path enumeration model - to Taxonomy
|Related to=Use the Architectural Pattern: TX-AP-01
}}

{{Scenarios about me}}
{{Reviews about me}}
{{Submission to event
|Event=WOP2009
}}

[[Category:Review assigned]]

Reviews:GerdGroener about Classification scheme - path enumeration model - to Taxonomy

2009-09-10T14:22:24Z

GerdGroener: New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2009/9/10 |SubmittedBy=GerdGroener |ContentOPUnderReview=Classification scheme - path enumeration model - to Taxonomy |RevisionID=5776 |...

{{Content OP Proposal Review Template
|CreationDate=2009/9/10
|SubmittedBy=GerdGroener
|ContentOPUnderReview=Classification scheme - path enumeration model - to Taxonomy
|RevisionID=5776
|Score=0 - needs major revision
|ReviewSummary=This pattern describes a taxonomy creation from a classification scheme based on a path enumeration model.
The idea is to represent the parent and children relation from the classification scheme which is a rooted tree by subClass relations between concepts in the taxonomy.
This kind of representation and transformation is straightforward and simple, but the pattern is quite complex.

The proposed pattern could be interesting for discussions at WOP since schema re-engineering is common modelling problem.
However, the pattern as it is proposed is rather complex for a very simple and basic modelling guideline (classified tree entities represented in a taxonomy). Therefore the quality and relevance of this pattern is not very high.

|ReviewConfidence=good
|ReviewProblems=The pattern is quite complex for a very simple ontological modelling approach, i.e. represent parent and children relations with subclass relations of concepts.
It seems that the process description and process example are executed in different directions: the process description starts with the general concept (parent node in the tree) and then considers the children nodes (sub-concepts), whereas the process example description starts with the subclasses (more special classes) and continues with the more general classes.

|ReviewRelevance=medium
|ReviewBestPractice=The taxonomical representation refers to good practice.
|ReviewUnderstandability=good
|ReviewClearProblem=medium
|ReviewClearRelevance=medium
|ReviewFigures=medium
}}

Reviews:GerdGroener about SynonymOrEquivalence (SOE)

2009-09-10T13:04:46Z

GerdGroener: Article updated via HTTP request

{{Content OP Proposal Review Template
|CreationDate=2009/9/8
|SubmittedBy=GerdGroener
|ContentOPUnderReview=SynonymOrEquivalence (SOE)
|RevisionID=5709
|Score=0 - needs major revision
|ReviewSummary=The proposed pattern (or anti-pattern) is useful for ontology
engineering, especially for less experienced developers.
It focuses a common modeling problem.
The proposed anti-pattern is technical sound.
However, it is quite simple.

Due to the simplicity of the pattern there are
few discussion issues at WOP.

|ReviewConfidence=The reviewer is familiar with ODPs in general and with the described modeling issue and proposed solution.
|ReviewProblems=Due to the simplicity of the pattern I doubt that the notion of a
design pattern somehow changes to a collection of simple modeling
primitives.
|ReviewRelevance=Definitely relevant for the community.
|ReviewBestPractice=Relevant to best practice modeling.
|ReviewReusability=The pattern is reusable.
|ReviewUnderstandability=The motivation of the pattern is well written. Unfortunately there is a breakup in the text.
The overall description of the pattern is well understandable.
|ReviewClearProblem=The problem is clearly described.
|ReviewClearRelevance=The relevance of the pattern and its benefits are given.
|ReviewFigures=Figures are missing.
|ReviewMissing=Provide simple examples: ontology + description.
}}
<noinclude>=====10-09-2009 [[User:GerdGroener]] says:=====
Reviewer Confidence: good
Community Relevance: good
Overall Understandability: good
Clear Problem Description: good
Clear Relevance and Consequences: medium</noinclude>

Submissions:DisjointnessOfComplement (DOC)

2009-09-10T12:18:27Z

GerdGroener: Review has been created. Annotation 'assigned' has been removed.

{{Logical_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
{{Include Image}}
{{Logical OP General Template
|Name=DisjointnessOfComplement (DOC)
|SubmittedBy=CatherineRoussey, OscarCorcho,
}}
{{Logical OP Description Template
|Motivation=We have identified a set of patterns that are commonly used by domain experts in their DL formalisations and OWL implementations, and that normally result in unsatisfiable classes or modelling errors. As aforementioned all these antipatterns come from a misuse and misunderstanding of DL expressions by ontology developers. Thus they are all Logical AntiPatterns (LAP): they are independent from a specific domain of interest, but dependent on the expressivity of the logical formalism used for the representation.
|Aim=The ontology developer may want to say that C1 and C2 cannot share instances, instead of defining C1 as the logical negation of C2. Hence it could be more appropriate to state that C1 and C2 are disjoint.
|Solution=C1 isEquivalentTo not C2
should be replace by
C1 disjointWith C2
}}
{{Logical OP Example Template
|ProblemExample=Salt_Lagoon isEquivalentTo not Fresh_Waters
see concept Laguna_Salada in Hydrontology
|SolutionExample=http://www.dia.fi.upm.es/~ocorcho/OWLDebugging/
}}
{{Logical OP Reference Template}}

{{Scenarios about me}}
{{Reviews about me}}
{{Submission to event
|Event=WOP2009:Main
}}

[[Category:Review assigned]]

Reviews:GerdGroener about DisjointnessOfComplement (DOC)

2009-09-10T12:18:26Z

GerdGroener: New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2009/9/10 |SubmittedBy=GerdGroener |ContentOPUnderReview=DisjointnessOfComplement (DOC) |RevisionID=5780 |Score=0 - needs major revision...

{{Content OP Proposal Review Template
|CreationDate=2009/9/10
|SubmittedBy=GerdGroener
|ContentOPUnderReview=DisjointnessOfComplement (DOC)
|RevisionID=5780
|Score=0 - needs major revision
|ReviewSummary=The motivation of the pattern is very good and in fact the misunderstanding of DL expressions leads to modeling errors and ambiguity. However, I'm not sure whether this pattern is very helpful.
With respect to the described "Aim" in the pattern, I don't understand why a developer defines C1 as the logical negation of C2 instead of
(probably more intuitive) using a disjointness axiom.

This could be a very interesting pattern/topic for discussion at WOP, for instance what is the intention of using disjointness instead of negation (are there benefits)?
However, the submitted pattern proposal so far is to weak to be accepted as a pattern. At least more explanation is necessary.

|ReviewConfidence=good
|ReviewProblems=For acceptance the pattern needs further explanations why it is
beneficial to use disjointness instead of negation.

|ReviewRelevance=good
|ReviewBestPractice=Here an explanation is missing why this kind of pattern refer to good practice. Simple examples would improve the understanding.
|ReviewReusability=This would be reusable since it refers to a very common and frequent modeling problem.

|ReviewUnderstandability=medium
|ReviewClearProblem=medium
|ReviewClearRelevance=medium
|ReviewFigures=medium, no Figures
}}

Reviews:GerdGroener about SynonymOrEquivalence (SOE)

2009-09-08T17:08:30Z

GerdGroener: New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2009/9/8 |SubmittedBy=GerdGroener |ContentOPUnderReview=SynonymOrEquivalence (SOE) |RevisionID=5709 |Score=0 - needs major revision |Rev...

'Ontology Design Patterns':EB-1st-f2f-2009Feb23

2009-02-06T08:56:56Z

GerdGroener: /* Attendees */

__FORCETOC__

= First Face 2 Face meeting of odp Editorial Board =

=== Agenda ===

=== Venue ===

The meeting will be held at the '''Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology''', '''Piaget''' room (first floor).

Via San Martino della Battaglia 44, Rome

=== Hotels ===

==== *** ====

'''Hotel Villa delle Rose'''
* Address: Via Vicenza 5
* Phone: +39-06-4451795

* Rates:
** Single room: Euro 75,00
** Double room: Euro 100,00
** Breakfast included

* Distance and Route: walking distance, 3 minutes

* Web site: http://www.villadellerose.it/it/index.htm

'''Hotel S. Marco'''
* Address: Via Villafranca 1
* Phone: +3906490437

* Services:
** Pay tv
** Internet access
** minibar
** From 29.01.2009 to 15.03.2009 (free of charge)

* Rates:
** Single room : Euro 80
** Double room single occupancy: Euro 90
** Double room : Euro 99,00

* Distance and route: 1 minute walking distance

* Web site: http://www.hotelsanmarcoroma.com/

'''Hotel Montecarlo'''
* Address: Via Palestro 17/a
* Phone: +39064460000

* Rates:
** Single room: Euro 70,00
** Double room :Euro 90,00

* Distance and route: 4 minutes walking distance

* Web site: http://laral.istc.cnr.it/address.htm

==== **** ====

'''Hotel Artemide'''

* Address: Via Nazionale 22
* Phone: +3906489911

* Services
** Internet access
** Mini-bar
** Room service
** Satellite TV
** Free daily newspaper

* Rates:
** Single room: Euro 170,00
** Double single use : Euro 170,00
** Breakfast included

* Distance and route: 10 minutes walking

* Web site: http://www.hotelartemide.it/en/index.htm

'''Hotel Cosmopolita'''
* Address: Via di Sant'Eufemia 5 (close to Piazza Venezia)
* Phone: +390699707606

* Services:
** Internet access
** Mini-bar
** Direct phone
** Satellite TV
** Room service

* Rates
** Single room : Euro 120,00
** Double room: Euro 130,00
** Breakfast included

Web site: http://www.leonardihotels.com/Pace-Elvezia/index2.jsp

* Distance and route: Take the bus 40 in Piazza Venezia and get off after three stops at Termini Station. From Termini walk for 5 minutes.

* Web site: http://www.hotel-cosmopolita.com/

'''Hotel Pace Elvetia'''
* Address: Via IV Novembre 104
* Phone: +39066795105

* Services:
** Wi-Fi in the hall
** Bar and Rooftop Terrace
** Remote control satellite tv
** Minibar
** Direct-dial telephone

* Rates:
** Single room : Euro 80,00
** Double room: Euro 100,00
** Breakfast included

* Distance and route: Take the bus 40 in Piazza Venezia and get off after three stops at Termini Station. From Termini just walk for 5 minutes.

* Web site: http://www.leonardihotels.com/Pace-Elvezia/index2.jsp

=== Editorial Board member ===
{{Group eb members}}

=== Attendees ===
* [[User:ValentinaPresutti| Valentina Presutti]]
* [[User:RimDJEDIDI| Rim Djedidi]]
* [[User:VojtechSvatek| Vojtech Svatek]]
* [[User:VioletaDamjanovic| Violeta Damjanovic]]
* [[User:EnricoDaga| Enrico Daga]]
* [[User:GerdGroener| Gerd Groener]]

=== Sunday dinner attendees ===

* [[USer:ValentinaPresutti| Valentina Presutti]]
* [[USer:RimDJEDIDI| Rim Djedidi]]
* [[User:VojtechSvatek| Vojtech Svatek]] (coming quite late, after 11pm, if at all)

=== Monday dinner attendees ===
* [[USer:ValentinaPresutti| Valentina Presutti]]
* [[User:VojtechSvatek| Vojtech Svatek]]
* [[User:VioletaDamjanovic| Violeta Damjanovic]]
* [[User:GerdGroener| Gerd Groener]]

=== Process Modeling Pattern Seminar (attendees) ===
* [[USer:ValentinaPresutti| Valentina Presutti]]
* [[User:VioletaDamjanovic| Violeta Damjanovic]]
* [[User:GerdGroener| Gerd Groener]]

=== Minutes ===

'Ontology Design Patterns':EB-1st-f2f-2009Feb23

2009-02-06T08:55:43Z

GerdGroener: /* Process Modeling Pattern Seminar (attendees) */

__FORCETOC__

= First Face 2 Face meeting of odp Editorial Board =

=== Agenda ===

=== Venue ===

The meeting will be held at the '''Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology''', '''Piaget''' room (first floor).

Via San Martino della Battaglia 44, Rome

=== Hotels ===

==== *** ====

'''Hotel Villa delle Rose'''
* Address: Via Vicenza 5
* Phone: +39-06-4451795

* Rates:
** Single room: Euro 75,00
** Double room: Euro 100,00
** Breakfast included

* Distance and Route: walking distance, 3 minutes

* Web site: http://www.villadellerose.it/it/index.htm

'''Hotel S. Marco'''
* Address: Via Villafranca 1
* Phone: +3906490437

* Services:
** Pay tv
** Internet access
** minibar
** From 29.01.2009 to 15.03.2009 (free of charge)

* Rates:
** Single room : Euro 80
** Double room single occupancy: Euro 90
** Double room : Euro 99,00

* Distance and route: 1 minute walking distance

* Web site: http://www.hotelsanmarcoroma.com/

'''Hotel Montecarlo'''
* Address: Via Palestro 17/a
* Phone: +39064460000

* Rates:
** Single room: Euro 70,00
** Double room :Euro 90,00

* Distance and route: 4 minutes walking distance

* Web site: http://laral.istc.cnr.it/address.htm

==== **** ====

'''Hotel Artemide'''

* Address: Via Nazionale 22
* Phone: +3906489911

* Services
** Internet access
** Mini-bar
** Room service
** Satellite TV
** Free daily newspaper

* Rates:
** Single room: Euro 170,00
** Double single use : Euro 170,00
** Breakfast included

* Distance and route: 10 minutes walking

* Web site: http://www.hotelartemide.it/en/index.htm

'''Hotel Cosmopolita'''
* Address: Via di Sant'Eufemia 5 (close to Piazza Venezia)
* Phone: +390699707606

* Services:
** Internet access
** Mini-bar
** Direct phone
** Satellite TV
** Room service

* Rates
** Single room : Euro 120,00
** Double room: Euro 130,00
** Breakfast included

Web site: http://www.leonardihotels.com/Pace-Elvezia/index2.jsp

* Distance and route: Take the bus 40 in Piazza Venezia and get off after three stops at Termini Station. From Termini walk for 5 minutes.

* Web site: http://www.hotel-cosmopolita.com/

'''Hotel Pace Elvetia'''
* Address: Via IV Novembre 104
* Phone: +39066795105

* Services:
** Wi-Fi in the hall
** Bar and Rooftop Terrace
** Remote control satellite tv
** Minibar
** Direct-dial telephone

* Rates:
** Single room : Euro 80,00
** Double room: Euro 100,00
** Breakfast included

* Distance and route: Take the bus 40 in Piazza Venezia and get off after three stops at Termini Station. From Termini just walk for 5 minutes.

* Web site: http://www.leonardihotels.com/Pace-Elvezia/index2.jsp

=== Editorial Board member ===
{{Group eb members}}

=== Attendees ===
* [[User:ValentinaPresutti| Valentina Presutti]]
* [[User:RimDJEDIDI| Rim Djedidi]]
* [[User:VojtechSvatek| Vojtech Svatek]]
* [[User:VioletaDamjanovic| Violeta Damjanovic]]
* [[User:EnricoDaga| Enrico Daga]]

=== Sunday dinner attendees ===

* [[USer:ValentinaPresutti| Valentina Presutti]]
* [[USer:RimDJEDIDI| Rim Djedidi]]
* [[User:VojtechSvatek| Vojtech Svatek]] (coming quite late, after 11pm, if at all)

=== Monday dinner attendees ===
* [[USer:ValentinaPresutti| Valentina Presutti]]
* [[User:VojtechSvatek| Vojtech Svatek]]
* [[User:VioletaDamjanovic| Violeta Damjanovic]]
* [[User:GerdGroener| Gerd Groener]]

=== Process Modeling Pattern Seminar (attendees) ===
* [[USer:ValentinaPresutti| Valentina Presutti]]
* [[User:VioletaDamjanovic| Violeta Damjanovic]]
* [[User:GerdGroener| Gerd Groener]]

=== Minutes ===

'Ontology Design Patterns':EB-1st-f2f-2009Feb23

2009-02-06T08:54:59Z

GerdGroener: /* Monday dinner attendees */

__FORCETOC__

= First Face 2 Face meeting of odp Editorial Board =

=== Agenda ===

=== Venue ===

The meeting will be held at the '''Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology''', '''Piaget''' room (first floor).

Via San Martino della Battaglia 44, Rome

=== Hotels ===

==== *** ====

'''Hotel Villa delle Rose'''
* Address: Via Vicenza 5
* Phone: +39-06-4451795

* Rates:
** Single room: Euro 75,00
** Double room: Euro 100,00
** Breakfast included

* Distance and Route: walking distance, 3 minutes

* Web site: http://www.villadellerose.it/it/index.htm

'''Hotel S. Marco'''
* Address: Via Villafranca 1
* Phone: +3906490437

* Services:
** Pay tv
** Internet access
** minibar
** From 29.01.2009 to 15.03.2009 (free of charge)

* Rates:
** Single room : Euro 80
** Double room single occupancy: Euro 90
** Double room : Euro 99,00

* Distance and route: 1 minute walking distance

* Web site: http://www.hotelsanmarcoroma.com/

'''Hotel Montecarlo'''
* Address: Via Palestro 17/a
* Phone: +39064460000

* Rates:
** Single room: Euro 70,00
** Double room :Euro 90,00

* Distance and route: 4 minutes walking distance

* Web site: http://laral.istc.cnr.it/address.htm

==== **** ====

'''Hotel Artemide'''

* Address: Via Nazionale 22
* Phone: +3906489911

* Services
** Internet access
** Mini-bar
** Room service
** Satellite TV
** Free daily newspaper

* Rates:
** Single room: Euro 170,00
** Double single use : Euro 170,00
** Breakfast included

* Distance and route: 10 minutes walking

* Web site: http://www.hotelartemide.it/en/index.htm

'''Hotel Cosmopolita'''
* Address: Via di Sant'Eufemia 5 (close to Piazza Venezia)
* Phone: +390699707606

* Services:
** Internet access
** Mini-bar
** Direct phone
** Satellite TV
** Room service

* Rates
** Single room : Euro 120,00
** Double room: Euro 130,00
** Breakfast included

Web site: http://www.leonardihotels.com/Pace-Elvezia/index2.jsp

* Distance and route: Take the bus 40 in Piazza Venezia and get off after three stops at Termini Station. From Termini walk for 5 minutes.

* Web site: http://www.hotel-cosmopolita.com/

'''Hotel Pace Elvetia'''
* Address: Via IV Novembre 104
* Phone: +39066795105

* Services:
** Wi-Fi in the hall
** Bar and Rooftop Terrace
** Remote control satellite tv
** Minibar
** Direct-dial telephone

* Rates:
** Single room : Euro 80,00
** Double room: Euro 100,00
** Breakfast included

* Distance and route: Take the bus 40 in Piazza Venezia and get off after three stops at Termini Station. From Termini just walk for 5 minutes.

* Web site: http://www.leonardihotels.com/Pace-Elvezia/index2.jsp

=== Editorial Board member ===
{{Group eb members}}

=== Attendees ===
* [[User:ValentinaPresutti| Valentina Presutti]]
* [[User:RimDJEDIDI| Rim Djedidi]]
* [[User:VojtechSvatek| Vojtech Svatek]]
* [[User:VioletaDamjanovic| Violeta Damjanovic]]
* [[User:EnricoDaga| Enrico Daga]]

=== Sunday dinner attendees ===

* [[USer:ValentinaPresutti| Valentina Presutti]]
* [[USer:RimDJEDIDI| Rim Djedidi]]
* [[User:VojtechSvatek| Vojtech Svatek]] (coming quite late, after 11pm, if at all)

=== Monday dinner attendees ===
* [[USer:ValentinaPresutti| Valentina Presutti]]
* [[User:VojtechSvatek| Vojtech Svatek]]
* [[User:VioletaDamjanovic| Violeta Damjanovic]]
* [[User:GerdGroener| Gerd Groener]]

=== Process Modeling Pattern Seminar (attendees) ===
* [[USer:ValentinaPresutti| Valentina Presutti]]
* [[User:VioletaDamjanovic| Violeta Damjanovic]]

=== Minutes ===