http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=HenrikEriksson 2026-04-15T10:09:59Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.25.6 http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Submissions:Partition&diff=5750 2009-09-08T22:40:55Z

<p>HenrikEriksson: Review has been created. Annotation 'assigned' has been removed.</p> <hr /> <div>{{Logical_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}<br /> {{Include Image}}<br /> {{Logical OP General Template<br /> |Name=Partition<br /> |SubmittedBy=OlafNoppens<br /> }}<br /> {{Logical OP Description Template<br /> |Motivation=This is a logical pattern to define a partition. It is independant of a specific domain. Partitions are a common modeling structure.<br /> |Aim=The ontology engineer may say that a class is a partition over other classes (including class expressions). A partition is a structure dividing its content into several parts.<br /> |Solution=We introduce two axioms where Partition is the Partition class and B1,...,Bn are arbitrary class expressions (n &gt;= 2) (expressed in OWL 2 Abstract Syntax)<br /> <br /> ''EquivalentClasses(Partition, ObjectUnionOf(B1, ..., Bn))''<br /> <br /> ''DisjointClasses(B1, ..., Bn)''<br /> }}<br /> {{Logical OP Example Template<br /> |SolutionExample=http://www.informatik.uni-ulm.de/ki/Noppens/owl/patterns/partition.owl<br /> }}<br /> {{Logical OP Reference Template}}<br /> <br /> {{Scenarios about me}}<br /> {{Reviews about me}}<br /> {{Submission to event<br /> |Event=WOP2009:Main<br /> }}</div>

HenrikEriksson http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:HenrikEriksson_about_Partition&diff=5749 2009-09-08T22:40:54Z

<p>HenrikEriksson: New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2009/9/9 |SubmittedBy=HenrikEriksson |ContentOPUnderReview=Partition |RevisionID=5748 |Score=0 - needs major revision |ReviewSummary=Thi...</p> <hr /> <div>{{Content OP Proposal Review Template<br /> |CreationDate=2009/9/9<br /> |SubmittedBy=HenrikEriksson<br /> |ContentOPUnderReview=Partition<br /> |RevisionID=5748<br /> |Score=0 - needs major revision<br /> |ReviewSummary=This is definitely a pattern that should be every ontology engineer's toolbox. However, the current description is poor. The wording in the motivation and aim should be improved and examples added.<br /> |ReviewConfidence=High<br /> |ReviewProblems=The pattern documentation needs improvements. Examples should be added.<br /> |ReviewRelevance=Relevant, but somewhat trivial.<br /> |ReviewBestPractice=This pattern is quite universal and commonly used (although you may not think of it).<br /> |ReviewReusability=The pattern is generic.<br /> |ReviewUnderstandability=Fundamentally, the pattern is easy to understand. However, the current description is unclear which makes the pattern more difficult to understand.<br /> |ReviewClearProblem=Currently, none at all.<br /> |ReviewClearRelevance=No.<br /> |ReviewFigures=Currently, no figures.<br /> |ReviewMissing=Problem description, examples, figures.<br /> }}</div>

HenrikEriksson