Submissions:SimpleOrAggregated

2010-08-31T13:04:39Z

MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa:

Submissions:SimpleOrAggregated

2010-08-31T12:56:53Z

MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa:

Submissions:Summarization of an inverse n-ary relation

2010-08-31T10:59:11Z

MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa:

Reviews:MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa about ConceptTerms

2009-09-08T15:20:54Z

MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa: New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2009/9/8 |SubmittedBy=MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa |ContentOPUnderReview=ConceptTerms |RevisionID=5714 |Score=0 - needs major revision |Revi...

{{Content OP Proposal Review Template
|CreationDate=2009/9/8
|SubmittedBy=MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa
|ContentOPUnderReview=ConceptTerms
|RevisionID=5714
|Score=0 - needs major revision
|ReviewSummary=The pattern try to represent linguistic information attached to a concept (concretelly, preferred term).
|ReviewConfidence=My confidence is medium representing linguistic information in ontologies.
|ReviewProblems=The main problem is that author does not provide reference to existing linguistic models that already represent this kind of information (such as the LIR model).
|ReviewRelevance=This kind of linguistic information includes in ontologies is relevant for many proposes. However, the pattern would have more impact if it be extracted or related to already existing models that are in use.
|ReviewClearProblem=The problem is not clearly described, because author mention something about synonyms and translations, and this kind of features are not included in the paper.
}}

Reviews:MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa about Enlarge Class Definition for Resolving Disjointness due to Subsomption 2

2009-09-08T15:11:57Z

MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa: New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2009/9/8 |SubmittedBy=MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa |ContentOPUnderReview=Enlarge Class Definition for Resolving Disjointness due to Subsompt...

{{Content OP Proposal Review Template
|CreationDate=2009/9/8
|SubmittedBy=MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa
|ContentOPUnderReview=Enlarge Class Definition for Resolving Disjointness due to Subsomption
|RevisionID=5731
|Score=-1 - reject
|ReviewSummary=It is not clear enough the motivation of this pattern. Indeed, in my opinion the example provided is not a good one (it seems strange to have a class called "Fauna-Flora"; what for me should be two different classes).
|ReviewConfidence=My confidence is high on modeling disjoint classes and hierarchies.
|ReviewProblems=The main problem for me is due to the example provide in the pattern. It is not clear that such situation should be represented having a class missed different domain elements.
}}

Submissions:Enlarge Class Definition for Resolving Disjointness due to Subsomption

2009-09-08T15:05:50Z

MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa: Review has been created. Annotation 'assigned' has been removed.

{{Logical_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
{{Include Image
|ImageName=Djedidi_LOP2_WOP09.pdf
}}
{{Logical OP General Template
|Name=Enlarge Class Definition for Resolving Disjointness due to Subsomption.
|SubmittedBy=RimDjedidi
|Author=Rim DJEDIDI
}}
{{Logical OP Description Template
|Motivation=Problem:
Resolve disjointness –caused by a subsumption– by enlarging a class definition.

Competency Question:
How to resolve disjointness –caused by a subsumption– by enlarging a definition of a class?
|Aim=The logical pattern models an alternative resolving disjointness inconsistency –caused by a subsumption– by enlarging the definition of a class.
|Solution=The pattern resolves a disjointness inconsistency –caused by a subsumption–by enlarging the definition of the sub-class object of the disjointness inconsistency, based on the definition of disjoint classes involved in the inconsistency.

Process:
1) The pattern enlarges the definition of the sub-class object of the disjointness inconsistency by defining –in its description– a union of the definitions of the disjoint classes involved in the inconsistency to be resolved.
|Elements=the following elements are manipulated y the pattern:

ID of the class to enlarge (classID).
ID(s) of the classes defining the enlargement.
Operator : Union
}}
{{Logical OP Example Template
|ProblemExample=Let’s consider the OWL ontology O defined by the following axioms:

{Animal ⊑Fauna-Flora, Plant ⊑Fauna-Flora, Carnivorous-Plant ⊑Plant, Plant ⊑ Not(Animal)}

If we apply a change to the ontology defining Carnivorous-Plant class as a sub-class of class Animal we cause a disjointness inconsistency as the class Carnivorous-Plant and the class Animal are disjointed. The proposed pattern propose a resolution alternative to this kind of inconsistency
|Consequences=Enlarge the definition of the class Carnivorous-Plant based on the definition of the classes Animal and Plant.
1) The pattern enlarges the definition of the sub-class object of the disjointness inconsistency Carnivorous-Plant by defining –in its description– a union of the definitions of the disjoint classes involved in the inconsistency: the classes Animal and Plant.
}}
{{Logical OP Reference Template}}

{{Scenarios about me}}
{{Reviews about me}}
{{Submission to event
|Event=WOP2009:Main
}}

[[Category:Review assigned]]

Reviews:MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa about Enlarge Class Definition for Resolving Disjointness due to Subsomption

2009-09-08T15:05:49Z

{{Content OP Proposal Review Template
|CreationDate=2009/9/8
|SubmittedBy=MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa
|ContentOPUnderReview=Enlarge Class Definition for Resolving Disjointness due to Subsomption
|RevisionID=5624
|Score=-1 - reject
|ReviewSummary=It is not clear enough the motivation of this pattern. Indeed, in my opinion the example provided is not a good one (it seems strange to have a class called "Fauna-Flora"; what for me should be two different classes).
|ReviewConfidence=Normal.
|ReviewProblems=The main problem for me is due to the example provide in the pattern. It is not clear that such situation should be represented having a class missed different domain elements.
}}

Feedback:Colon in the ODP template

2008-10-10T08:34:36Z

MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa: New page: {{TitleDescription Template |Title=Colon (:) in the ODP template |Description=It would be clearer if you include a colon after each ODP template slot when the ODP is shown/presented becaus...

{{TitleDescription Template
|Title=Colon (:) in the ODP template
|Description=It would be clearer if you include a colon after each ODP template slot when the ODP is shown/presented because sometimes is not clear when the name slot finishes.
}}
{{Feedback Template
|Author=User:MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa, User:MariaPoveda
|Priority=Medium
|Status=To be done
}}

Feedback:Error in links

2008-05-06T11:42:22Z

MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa: New page: {{TitleDescription Template |Title=Link does not available |Description=In the page about "evaluation principles", the link " ODP CP annotation schema " does not work }} {{Feedback Templa...

{{TitleDescription Template
|Title=Link does not available
|Description=In the page about "evaluation principles", the link " ODP CP annotation schema " does not work
}}
{{Feedback Template
|Author=User:MariCarmenDeFigueroa
|Priority=High
|Status=To be done
}}