http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Community%3ARinkeHoekstra_about_NegativePropertyAssertions 2026-04-29T23:56:13Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.25.6 http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Community:RinkeHoekstra_about_NegativePropertyAssertions&diff=5987&oldid=prev 2009-10-24T20:04:46Z

<p>New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2009-10-24 |SubmittedBy=RinkeHoekstra |ContentOPUnderReview=NegativePropertyAssertions |RevisionID=5903 |Score=-1 - reject |ReviewSummar...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Content OP Proposal Review Template<br /> |CreationDate=2009-10-24<br /> |SubmittedBy=RinkeHoekstra<br /> |ContentOPUnderReview=NegativePropertyAssertions<br /> |RevisionID=5903<br /> |Score=-1 - reject<br /> |ReviewSummary=The author of this pattern fails to mention that the negative property assertions of OWL 2 are purely syntactic sugar for exactly the pattern he describes. <br /> <br /> They are explicitly introduced in OWL 2 in e.g. the new features and rationale document.<br /> <br /> In conclusion, this pattern may be useful to users sticking with OWL 1 (although I have no idea why they would want to), and as such can be a valuable contribution to this wiki. However, it would be wrong to attribute it to the current author (though he should receive credit for making it available on the wiki).<br /> <br /> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/PR-owl2-new-features-20090922/#F3:_NegativeObjectPropertyAssertion_and_NegativeDataPropertyAssertion<br /> }}</div>

RinkeHoekstra