Community:Sex (of those who are not angels) - Revision history

LUIGISELMI: how this issue is managed in DOLCE

2012-01-23T13:36:08Z

how this issue is managed in DOLCE

LUIGISELMI: DUL doesn't have qualia

2012-01-23T13:28:48Z

DUL doesn't have qualia

LUIGISELMI at 11:22, 23 January 2012

2012-01-23T11:22:15Z

LUIGISELMI at 11:21, 23 January 2012

2012-01-23T11:21:11Z

LUIGISELMI: Two approaches to define the genre of a species

2012-01-23T11:20:01Z

Two approaches to define the genre of a species

New page

{{TitleDescription Template
|Title=Sex (of those who are not angels)
|Description=Sex, or more properly genre, can be used to separate a species in to two disjoint subsets: male and female. The two properties (in the sense of DOLCE) are rigid (by nature at list). So it seems to make sense to model the genre of a species, human for example, as two subproperties (subclasses) of dul:NaturalPerson: Woman and Man. An other approach could be tu create a Genre as a quality and then two qualia Male and Female as qualities of Natural Person or what ever other biological entity.
}}
{{Graphical representation}}
{{Modeling Issue Template}}
{{Additional information header}}

{{My references}}
{{Modeling Issue toolbar}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{TitleDescription Template
 |Title=Sex (of those who are not angels)
-|Description=Sex, or more properly genre, can be used to separate a species into two disjoint subsets: male and female. The two properties (in the sense of DOLCE) are rigid (by nature at list). So it seems to make sense to model the genre of a species, human for example, as two subproperties (subclasses) of dul:NaturalPerson: Woman and Man. An other approach could be tu create a :Genre as a quality and then two qualia :Male and :Female. The :Genre dul:isQualityOf dul:NaturalPerson while :Male and :Female should be values available for :Genre. The problem with this approach is that DUL doesn't have Quale as property.
+|Description=Sex, or more properly genre, can be used to separate a species into two disjoint subsets: male and female. The two properties (in the sense of DOLCE) are rigid (by nature at list). So it seems to make sense to model the genre of a species, human for example, as two subproperties (subclasses) of dul:NaturalPerson: Woman and Man. An other approach could be tu create a :Genre as a quality and then two qualia :Male and :Female. The :Genre dul:isQualityOf dul:NaturalPerson while :Male and :Female should be values available for :Genre. The problem with this approach is that DUL doesn't have Quale as property and there is not a relation between a dul:Quality and some other entity that could be a quale. In DOLCE a dol:quality and a dol:quale could be linked through the dol:hasQuale relation.
 }}
 {{Graphical representation}}

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 }}
 {{Graphical representation}}
-{{Modeling Issue Template}}
+{{Modeling Issue Template
 {{Additional information header}}
 {{My references}}
 {{Modeling Issue toolbar}}