<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reviews%3AEnricoMotta_about_Literal_Reification</id>
		<title>Reviews:EnricoMotta about Literal Reification - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reviews%3AEnricoMotta_about_Literal_Reification"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:EnricoMotta_about_Literal_Reification&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-06-18T06:52:15Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.25.6</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:EnricoMotta_about_Literal_Reification&amp;diff=10127&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>EnricoMotta: New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/19 |SubmittedBy=EnricoMotta |ContentOPUnderReview=Literal Reification |RevisionID=10110 |Score=1 - needs minor revision |ReviewSu...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:EnricoMotta_about_Literal_Reification&amp;diff=10127&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2010-09-19T19:24:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/19 |SubmittedBy=EnricoMotta |ContentOPUnderReview=Literal Reification |RevisionID=10110 |Score=1 - needs minor revision |ReviewSu...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Content OP Proposal Review Template&lt;br /&gt;
|CreationDate=2010/9/19&lt;br /&gt;
|SubmittedBy=EnricoMotta&lt;br /&gt;
|ContentOPUnderReview=Literal Reification&lt;br /&gt;
|RevisionID=10110&lt;br /&gt;
|Score=1 - needs minor revision&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewSummary=Useful pattern supporting the reification of literal values within OWL, so that they can be used as 'first class objects' in OWL models. The pattern seems valid, however I had trouble trying to browse it in both NeOn and Topbraid, which made my life a bit painful. I am also surprised that the pattern does not clarify how to link the resulting reified literals to the obvious related entities - e,g, an entity such as http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hilton%2C_Paris, which describes ParisHilton.&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewConfidence=High&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewProblems=The OWL source does not load properly in either topbraid or neon. This should be fixed. &lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewRelevance=This is very useful pattern applicable to zillions of scenarios&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewBestPractice=There are a lot of proposals about how to talk about tags and link web2.0 systems to the semantic web and a comparison with the way other people have tackled this problem would be useful.&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewReusability=The pattern is very reusable&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewUnderstandability=The pattern is reasonably easy to understand although the description, context and motivation are rather minimalist&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewClearProblem=I think the scenario could be made clearer and more meaningful by showing how to link tags to the owl entities denoting the same object as the tag&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewMissing=How do I link the tag :parisTag2 in your scenario to http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hilton%2C_Paris?&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>EnricoMotta</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>