http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Reviews%3AFrancoisScharffe_about_ConceptGroup 2026-05-08T16:02:28Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.25.6 http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:FrancoisScharffe_about_ConceptGroup&diff=5806&oldid=prev 2009-09-11T11:59:57Z

<p>New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2009/9/11 |SubmittedBy=FrancoisScharffe |ContentOPUnderReview=ConceptGroup |RevisionID=5799 |Score=0 - needs major revision |ReviewSumma...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Content OP Proposal Review Template<br /> |CreationDate=2009/9/11<br /> |SubmittedBy=FrancoisScharffe<br /> |ContentOPUnderReview=ConceptGroup<br /> |RevisionID=5799<br /> |Score=0 - needs major revision<br /> |ReviewSummary=This pattern is meant to be used to represent group memberships of concepts. Sub and super groups can be represented, and both extensional (declared) and intensional (according to a property) memberships can be modeled. <br /> <br /> The pattern seems interesting but present many shadowed areas. I can deduce from the usage of the terms concept ans broader/narrower relations that this pattern is to be used together with the SKOS vocabulary. If this is the case this should be made explicit. Otherwise, what is a concept wrt an owl:Class ?<br /> I lack an example instantiation of the pattern.<br /> The Solution Description contains questions ... Questions are no solutions...<br /> In summary I think it is an interesting pattern which could certainly find applications when publishing terminologies with SKOS. The pattern however needs to be better described. This pattern can definitely lead to interesting discussions.<br /> |ReviewConfidence=average<br /> |ReviewProblems=The problem of modeling group membership is important<br /> |ReviewRelevance=relevant<br /> |ReviewBestPractice=If there are other solutions they are not mentioned by the pattern. <br /> |ReviewReusability=Yesm this pattern seem to be usable in a variety of situations<br /> |ReviewRelations=It is only indicated that this pattern is extracted from SNOMED-CT.<br /> |ReviewUnderstandability=Okay<br /> |ReviewClearProblem=Okay<br /> |ReviewClearRelevance=Here it misses a statement about the pattern usage together with SKOS<br /> |ReviewFigures=Okay<br /> |ReviewMissing=The pattern description misses an example instanciation.<br /> }}</div>

FrancoisScharffe