http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Reviews%3AGerdGroener_about_SimpleOrAggregated 2026-04-16T10:41:02Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.25.6 http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:GerdGroener_about_SimpleOrAggregated&diff=10102&oldid=prev 2010-09-10T17:19:10Z

<p>New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/10 |SubmittedBy=GerdGroener |ContentOPUnderReview=SimpleOrAggregated |RevisionID=10097 |Score=2 - accept for certification |Revie...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Content OP Proposal Review Template<br /> |CreationDate=2010/9/10<br /> |SubmittedBy=GerdGroener<br /> |ContentOPUnderReview=SimpleOrAggregated<br /> |RevisionID=10097<br /> |Score=2 - accept for certification<br /> |ReviewSummary=The pattern describes a disjoint partition of objects into simple and aggregated objects that consist of at least two objects.<br /> <br /> The proposed solution seems to be sound. <br /> There is just one minor remark (see problems).<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> |ReviewConfidence=high<br /> |ReviewProblems=I was a bit distracted by the terms &quot;non-transitive fashion&quot;. What is non-transitive? Are the aggregated objects non-transitive connected? Is it relevant or why is it relevant?<br /> <br /> This should be clarified in the final version<br /> |ReviewRelevance=good<br /> |ReviewBestPractice=good<br /> |ReviewUnderstandability=See the comment above (Problems)<br /> }}</div>

GerdGroener