http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Reviews%3AHenrikEriksson_about_Partition 2026-04-17T09:43:32Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.25.6 http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:HenrikEriksson_about_Partition&diff=5749&oldid=prev 2009-09-08T22:40:54Z

<p>New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2009/9/9 |SubmittedBy=HenrikEriksson |ContentOPUnderReview=Partition |RevisionID=5748 |Score=0 - needs major revision |ReviewSummary=Thi...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Content OP Proposal Review Template<br /> |CreationDate=2009/9/9<br /> |SubmittedBy=HenrikEriksson<br /> |ContentOPUnderReview=Partition<br /> |RevisionID=5748<br /> |Score=0 - needs major revision<br /> |ReviewSummary=This is definitely a pattern that should be every ontology engineer's toolbox. However, the current description is poor. The wording in the motivation and aim should be improved and examples added.<br /> |ReviewConfidence=High<br /> |ReviewProblems=The pattern documentation needs improvements. Examples should be added.<br /> |ReviewRelevance=Relevant, but somewhat trivial.<br /> |ReviewBestPractice=This pattern is quite universal and commonly used (although you may not think of it).<br /> |ReviewReusability=The pattern is generic.<br /> |ReviewUnderstandability=Fundamentally, the pattern is easy to understand. However, the current description is unclear which makes the pattern more difficult to understand.<br /> |ReviewClearProblem=Currently, none at all.<br /> |ReviewClearRelevance=No.<br /> |ReviewFigures=Currently, no figures.<br /> |ReviewMissing=Problem description, examples, figures.<br /> }}</div>

HenrikEriksson