<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reviews%3AOlafNoppens_about_Literal_Reification</id>
		<title>Reviews:OlafNoppens about Literal Reification - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reviews%3AOlafNoppens_about_Literal_Reification"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:OlafNoppens_about_Literal_Reification&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-14T13:38:15Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.25.6</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:OlafNoppens_about_Literal_Reification&amp;diff=10109&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>OlafNoppens: New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/16 |SubmittedBy=OlafNoppens |ContentOPUnderReview=Literal Reification |RevisionID=10062 |Score=2 - accept for certification |Revi...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:OlafNoppens_about_Literal_Reification&amp;diff=10109&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2010-09-16T13:43:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/16 |SubmittedBy=OlafNoppens |ContentOPUnderReview=Literal Reification |RevisionID=10062 |Score=2 - accept for certification |Revi...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Content OP Proposal Review Template&lt;br /&gt;
|CreationDate=2010/9/16&lt;br /&gt;
|SubmittedBy=OlafNoppens&lt;br /&gt;
|ContentOPUnderReview=Literal Reification&lt;br /&gt;
|RevisionID=10062&lt;br /&gt;
|Score=2 - accept for certification&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewSummary=The pattern states how to express reification of literal values in OWL by introducing an intermediate individual (type of Literal) which is connected (via hasLiteralValue) to a blank literal value, or via hasSameLiteralValue to another intermediate individual.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have two minor remarks (which depends on each other):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Literal is a subclass of (= 1 hasLiteralValue). I was wondering whether one could define literal equivalent to (= 1 hasLiteralValue or  = 1 hasSameLiteralValue). The idea is that a literal has always either a literal value directly or indirectly (via hasSameLiteralValue)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2)SWRL rules are used (in that sense it would also be valid if Literal is defined equivalent to = 1 hasLiteralValue because the SWRL rules guarantee this behaviour). I suggest to add a remark to the description and also to the diagram. Because the application of the pattern assumes SWRL + OWL.&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewConfidence=high&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewRelevance=high&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewReusability=high&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewUnderstandability=good&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewClearProblem=good&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewClearRelevance=good&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewFigures=good - I suggest as mentioned above that the desription and the figures make a reference to rules / SWRL&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OlafNoppens</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>