<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reviews%3ARimDJEDIDI_about_Faceted_Classification_Scheme</id>
		<title>Reviews:RimDJEDIDI about Faceted Classification Scheme - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reviews%3ARimDJEDIDI_about_Faceted_Classification_Scheme"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:RimDJEDIDI_about_Faceted_Classification_Scheme&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-08T17:43:46Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.25.6</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:RimDJEDIDI_about_Faceted_Classification_Scheme&amp;diff=10103&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>RimDJEDIDI: New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/15 |SubmittedBy=RimDJEDIDI |ContentOPUnderReview=Faceted Classification Scheme |RevisionID=10067 |Score=1 - needs minor revision ...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:RimDJEDIDI_about_Faceted_Classification_Scheme&amp;diff=10103&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2010-09-15T15:39:15Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/15 |SubmittedBy=RimDJEDIDI |ContentOPUnderReview=Faceted Classification Scheme |RevisionID=10067 |Score=1 - needs minor revision ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Content OP Proposal Review Template&lt;br /&gt;
|CreationDate=2010/9/15&lt;br /&gt;
|SubmittedBy=RimDJEDIDI&lt;br /&gt;
|ContentOPUnderReview=Faceted Classification Scheme&lt;br /&gt;
|RevisionID=10067&lt;br /&gt;
|Score=1 - needs minor revision&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewSummary=This pattern could be a useful solution to model a specific domain as A Faceted Classification Scheme (FCS)and classify its items(classes or individuals).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The evaluation of this pattern should take into account the one of Normalization ODP pattern submitted. There is important mapping between the two patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some remarks (to verify):&lt;br /&gt;
- Mutual exclusion between categories of FCS (as mentioned in the definition) is not included in Normalization ODP generic structure (part ontology).&lt;br /&gt;
- In the description of part &amp;quot;Process&amp;quot;, considering the Normalization ODP, Facet_i should &amp;quot;has&amp;quot; and not &amp;quot;become&amp;quot; an object property :hasFacet_i.&lt;br /&gt;
- There is a little difference between the first item example in the description of &amp;quot;Example of Non-Ontological Resource&amp;quot; and in the graphical representation of &amp;quot;Ontology Example&amp;quot; as well as in the description of &amp;quot;Process example&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
-the OWL defined class &amp;quot;ManualDishDetergent&amp;quot; in the graphical representation of &amp;quot;Ontology example&amp;quot; should be &amp;quot;PersonDishDetergent&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
- in the graphical representation of &amp;quot;Process example&amp;quot;, there is the generic representation of the process and not the example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions&lt;br /&gt;
-Is there any difference between Normalization ODP modeling issues and FCS modeling issues?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewConfidence=Competence in ODPs in general and the problem addressed.&lt;br /&gt;
|ReviewUnderstandability=Easy to understand with clear details.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RimDJEDIDI</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>