http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Reviews%3ARimDJEDIDI_about_Symmetric_n-ary_relationship 2026-04-09T21:48:02Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.25.6 http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:RimDJEDIDI_about_Symmetric_n-ary_relationship&diff=10112&oldid=prev 2010-09-16T14:31:24Z

<p>New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/16 |SubmittedBy=RimDJEDIDI |ContentOPUnderReview=Symmetric n-ary relationship |RevisionID=10106 |Score=0 - needs major revision |...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Content OP Proposal Review Template<br /> |CreationDate=2010/9/16<br /> |SubmittedBy=RimDJEDIDI<br /> |ContentOPUnderReview=Symmetric n-ary relationship<br /> |RevisionID=10106<br /> |Score=0 - needs major revision<br /> |ReviewSummary=This pattern is proposed to model Symmetric n-ary relationship by explicitly expressing that participating classes have the same attributes and values of these attributes; while avoiding redundancy representation.<br /> <br /> the general problem addressed by this pattern (modeling issues) is not defined. Besides, the pattern is not explained neither presented as a generic solution. Solution description is not sufficiently convincing : do cardinality and equivalentClass axioms guarantee the purpose of the pattern?<br /> <br /> Explanation, proof and implementation are missed. And this is very important when proposing an ODP to be reused.<br /> <br /> the given example is not suitable as it is based on a symmetric binary-relationship.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> |ReviewConfidence=Competence in ODPs in general and addressed problem.<br /> }}</div>

RimDJEDIDI