http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Reviews%3ARinkeHoekstra_about_PeriodicInterval 2026-04-09T13:35:18Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.25.6 http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:RinkeHoekstra_about_PeriodicInterval&diff=11171&oldid=prev 2012-08-21T12:37:18Z

<p>New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2012/8/21 |SubmittedBy=RinkeHoekstra |ContentOPUnderReview=PeriodicInterval |RevisionID=11152 |Score=0 - needs major revision |ReviewSum...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Content OP Proposal Review Template<br /> |CreationDate=2012/8/21<br /> |SubmittedBy=RinkeHoekstra<br /> |ContentOPUnderReview=PeriodicInterval<br /> |RevisionID=11152<br /> |Score=0 - needs major revision<br /> |ReviewSummary=The pattern for periodic intervals is highly relevant in many scenarios. It is a useful extension of the OWL Time ontology. It adequately imports the CP annotation schema, but does not really provide any documentation <br /> <br /> However, the pattern is too simplistic in its current form. In a way, the current definition can be read as a recipe for instantiating the sub intervals. This is done via a single object property (hasIntervalDurationPerPeriod), but could have been represented in OWL as restrictions on the PeriodicInterval class itself, e.g. it could be defined as a class with only subintervals of a particular length. The authors could spend some time thinking of how to augment their definition to make it more expressive (e.g. how to make sure the subintervals do not overlap)<br /> <br /> Furthermore, the pattern does not adequately restrict the class, it only defines domain and range of two new properties. A PeriodicInterval should at least have two subintervals and a period that separates them.<br /> |ReviewConfidence=High<br /> |ReviewProblems=The pattern is overly simplistic (see summary)<br /> |ReviewRelevance=High<br /> |ReviewBestPractice=The pattern does not present a best practice<br /> |ReviewReusability=High<br /> |ReviewRelations=Many in the category Time, but in particular [[Submissions:TimeInterval]] and [[Submissions:Sequence]]<br /> |ReviewUnderstandability=Ok<br /> |ReviewClearProblem=Ok<br /> |ReviewClearRelevance=Ok<br /> |ReviewFigures=Yes<br /> }}</div>

RinkeHoekstra