http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Reviews%3AVojtechSvatek_about_EventProcessing 2026-04-25T10:37:49Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.25.6 http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=Reviews:VojtechSvatek_about_EventProcessing&diff=11664&oldid=prev 2013-08-07T13:51:25Z

<p>New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2013/8/7 |SubmittedBy=VojtechSvatek |ContentOPUnderReview=EventProcessing |RevisionID=11646 |Score=1 - needs minor revision |ReviewSumma...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Content OP Proposal Review Template<br /> |CreationDate=2013/8/7<br /> |SubmittedBy=VojtechSvatek<br /> |ContentOPUnderReview=EventProcessing<br /> |RevisionID=11646<br /> |Score=1 - needs minor revision<br /> |ReviewSummary=Pattern description conforming to the usual standards of the portal, with only minor details missing.<br /> |ReviewConfidence=I am not expert in sensors, and haven't been even extensively involved in event modeling. My familiarity with ODPs in general is however solid.<br /> |ReviewProblems=I don't see any major problems. Only some details of the pattern should be clarified to ensure its proper use.<br /> The diagram also lacks classes SensorOutput and EventObjectPart, which are listed in the glossary.<br /> |ReviewRelevance=The pattern looks quite relevant for the sensor community.<br /> |ReviewBestPractice=The pattern builds on existing upper-level ontologies, adding a lightweight extra layer. It could thus become a part of best practices.<br /> |ReviewReusability=The pattern is highly generic and thus well-reusable.<br /> |ReviewRelations=There are already some patterns in the catalog that deal with temporality, but not really with capturing information about events.<br /> |ReviewUnderstandability=The pattern is relatively clear. Obviously, its presentation at such small space raises some questions. (I listed them rather in the paper review.)<br /> |ReviewClearProblem=Although the modeling problem is clear, it is not explicitly stated how the pattern would contribute to proper inferencing in an application.<br /> |ReviewClearRelevance=The pattern is relatively simple, and its use doesn't seem to have dramatic consequences.<br /> |ReviewFigures=The figure is OK, except two missing classes. There is an illustrative OWL fragment available. The notation is standard.<br /> |ReviewMissing=Two missing classes in the diagram.<br /> }}</div>

VojtechSvatek