Submissions:SpeciesHabitat - Revision history

EnricoDaga at 13:55, 8 March 2010

2010-03-08T13:55:57Z

EnricoDaga: Text replace - '{{Reviews about me}}' to '{{Reviews about me}}{{Modeling issues about me}}'

2010-03-01T13:29:14Z

Text replace - '{{Reviews about me}}' to '{{Reviews about me}}{{Modeling issues about me}}'

EnricoDaga: Text replace - 'Include Image' to 'Graphical representation'

2010-03-01T12:40:30Z

Text replace - 'Include Image' to 'Graphical representation'

Admin: Text replace - 'SubmittedBy=User:' to 'SubmittedBy='

2009-03-10T15:32:25Z

Text replace - 'SubmittedBy=User:' to 'SubmittedBy='

Admin at 10:44, 23 February 2009

2009-02-23T10:44:52Z

AldoGangemi at 10:49, 10 February 2009

2009-02-10T10:49:49Z

New page

{{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
{{Include Image
|ImageName=
}}
{{Content OP Proposal Template
|Name=SpeciesHabitat
|SubmittedBy=AldoGangemi
|ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/fsdas/specieshabitat.owl
|RelatedCP=speciesconditions.owl
|Consequences=The pattern allows to represent species with a typical habitat and a typical water area where the exemplars can be found. However, there is no direct relation between the habitat (type) and the water area; in principle, it is possible that there are no places in the water area that provide the conditions for that habitat.
In order to represent that a species has a habitat within a given water area, the situation pattern should be reused and specialized, as in the speciesconditions.owl pattern.
|Intent=to represent species together with their typical environment in terms of habitat and water area
|CompetencyQuestion=what species have what habitat in what water area?
|Scenario=give me the species having a 'demersal' habitat in water area '24'
}}
{{Element list header}}
{{Has Element Template
|HasElement=Habitat
}}
{{Has Element Template
|HasElement=hasHabitat
}}
{{Has Element Template
|HasElement=isHabitatFor
}}

{{Scenarios about me}}
{{Reviews about me}}
This pattern encodes a FSDAS competency question, with an indication to use some Species class, and some hasHabitat property, with range xsd:string.
Since the application task of FSDAS is to jointly query FIGIS factsheet data and RTMS time series data, the pattern must encode elements that can be easily mapped to FIGIS and RTMS schemas/ontologies.
Issue (1) mapping Species to FIGIS schema, since the needed schema elements are two instead of one.
Issue (2) representation of habitats in the pattern is intuitively with objects, since habitats are typically objects, and points in a value space (as the referents of xsd datatypes typically are). The suggestion in the competencey question is to use xsd.string though.

(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology

(versionInfo): Created by Aldo Gangemi

(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/fsdas/aquaticresources.owl

(versionInfo): 1.0

(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl

(comment): This pattern encodes a FSDAS competency question, with an indication to use some Species class, and some hasHabitat property, with range xsd:string.
Since the application task of FSDAS is to jointly query FIGIS factsheet data and RTMS time series data, the pattern must encode elements that can be easily mapped to FIGIS and RTMS schemas/ontologies.
Issue (1) mapping Species to FIGIS schema, since the needed schema elements are two instead of one.
Issue (2) representation of habitats in the pattern is intuitively with objects, since habitats are typically objects, and points in a value space (as the referents of xsd datatypes typically are). The suggestion in the competencey question is to use xsd.string though.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
-{{Include Image
+{{Graphical representation
 |ImageName=Specieshabitat.jpg
 }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
 {{Graphical representation
 |ImageName=Specieshabitat.jpg
@@ Line 8: / Line 9: @@
 |Intent=to represent species together with their typical environment in terms of habitat and water area
 |CompetencyQuestion=what species have what habitat in what water area?
 |ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/fsdas/specieshabitat.owl
 |Consequences=The pattern allows to represent species with a typical habitat and a typical water area where the exemplars can be found. However, there is no direct relation between the habitat (type) and the water area; in principle, it is possible that there are no places in the water area that provide the conditions for that habitat.
@@ Line 23: / Line 25: @@
 |HasElement=isHabitatFor
 }}
 This pattern encodes a FSDAS competency question, with an indication to use some Species class, and some hasHabitat property, with range xsd:string.
 Since the application task of FSDAS is to jointly query FIGIS factsheet data and RTMS time series data, the pattern must encode elements that can be easily mapped to FIGIS and RTMS schemas/ontologies.
@@ Line 43: / Line 46: @@
 Issue (2) representation of habitats in the pattern is intuitively with objects, since habitats are typically objects, and points in a value space (as the referents of xsd datatypes typically are). The suggestion in the competencey question is to use xsd.string though.
 {{Scenarios about me}}
-{{Reviews about me}}{{Modeling issues about me}}
+{{Reviews about me}}

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 }}
 {{Content OP Proposal Template
-|SubmittedBy=User:AldoGangemi
+|SubmittedBy=AldoGangemi
 |Name=SpeciesHabitat
 |Intent=to represent species together with their typical environment in terms of habitat and water area