Class: fntbox:FullTextAnnotation
http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/framenet/tbox/FullTextAnnotation
Annotations (1)
-
rdfs:comment "Formally, FrameNet annotations are constellations of triples that make up the frame element realization for each annotated sentence, each consisting of a frame element (for example, Food), a grammatical function (say, Object) and a phrase type (say, NP). We think of these three types of annotation on each tagged frame element as layers.
The work can be divided into two kinds according to the way in which sentences are chosen for annotation.
In the 'lexicographic annotation' mode, our main focus is on the goal of recording the range of semantic and syntactic combinatory possibilities (valences) of each word in each of its senses. To that end, we extract sentences from the different texts of a corpus because they contain a predetermined target LU. Then we annotate a selection of the extracted sentences in respect to that particular LU.
In another kind of work that represents a much smaller percentage of our overall annotations, we annotate running text. This is called 'full-text annotation'. Full-text annotation differs from sentence annotation mostly in that the sentences are chosen for us, so to speak, by the author of the text. The annotation of running text is technically possible thanks to the annotation layering technique: FN lexicographers can one by one declare each word in a sentence a target, select a frame relative to which the new target is to be annotated, get a new set of annotation layers (frame element, grammatical function, phrase type) and appropriate frame element tags, and then annotate the relevant constituents.
Before going further into the details of annotation, let us briefly consider the Revenge frame, which will figure as an example frame repeatedly in this chapter. The definition of this frame follows:
'An Avenger performs some Punishment on an Offender as a response to an earlier action, the Injury, that was inflicted on an Injured party. The Avenger need not be identical to the Injured party but needs to consider the prior action of the Offender a wrong. Importantly, the punishment of the Offender by the Avenger is seen as justified by individual or group opinion rather than by law.'
Thus, the frame elements in the Revenge frame are Avenger, Punishment, Offender, Injury, and Injured party.
Lexical units in this frame include avenge.v, avenger.n, get even.v, retaliate.v, retaliation.n, retribution.n, retributive.a, retributory.a, revenge.v, revenge.n, revengeful.a, revenger.n, vengeance.n, vengeful.a, and vin- dictive.a. Some example sentences with the lexical unit avenge are given here.
(1) [His brothers Avenger] avenged [him Injured party]. (2) With this, [El Cid Agent] at once avenged [the death of his son Injury]. (3) [Hook Avenger] tries to avenge [himself Injured party] [on Peter Pan Offender] [by becoming a second and better father Punishment]." (xsd:string)
Superclasses (3)
Disjoints (14)
fntbox:AnnotationSet,
fntbox:CorpDoc,
fntbox:Document,
fntbox:FECoreSet,
fntbox:Frame,
fntbox:FrameElement,
fntbox:Header,
fntbox:Label,
fntbox:Layer,
fntbox:Lexeme,
fntbox:LexUnit,
fntbox:SemType,
fntbox:Sentence,
fntbox:SentenceCount
Usage (5)