Community:Different types of relationships
From Odp
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TitleDescription Template | {{TitleDescription Template | ||
|Title=Different types of relationships for ontology representation | |Title=Different types of relationships for ontology representation | ||
| - | |Description=The flexibility of the ontology editor to represent taxonomies based on different types of relationships between concepts and with specific features, constraints and rules for each type of relationship. E.g., specialization taxonomies, composition taxonomies, lists, etc. The reason is that some features for specialization taxonomies (represented by the existing editors, e.g., property inheritance) are not appropriate for other types of | + | |Description=The flexibility of the ontology editor to represent taxonomies based on different types of relationships between concepts and with specific features, constraints and rules for each type of relationship. E.g., specialization (is-a) taxonomies, composition (part-whole) taxonomies, lists, etc. The reason is that some features for the specialization taxonomies (represented by the existing editors, e.g., the property inheritance) are not always appropriate for taxonomies based on other types of relationships. |
Also, the editor flexibility to represent taxonomies based on new types of relationships and specific features. | Also, the editor flexibility to represent taxonomies based on new types of relationships and specific features. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:51, 16 April 2010
Different types of relationships
Title: Different types of relationships for ontology representation
Description: The flexibility of the ontology editor to represent taxonomies based on different types of relationships between concepts and with specific features, constraints and rules for each type of relationship. E.g., specialization (is-a) taxonomies, composition (part-whole) taxonomies, lists, etc. The reason is that some features for the specialization taxonomies (represented by the existing editors, e.g., the property inheritance) are not always appropriate for taxonomies based on other types of relationships. Also, the editor flexibility to represent taxonomies based on new types of relationships and specific features.
Diagram (this article has no graphical representation)
About
| Users | AlexandraGalatescu |
|---|---|
| Domains | Ontology |
| Competency Questions | |
| Scenarios | |
| Proposed Solutions (OWL files) | |
| Related patterns | |
Additional information
References
