Community:Sex (of those who are not angels)

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (13:36, 23 January 2012) (view source)
(how this issue is managed in DOLCE)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TitleDescription Template
{{TitleDescription Template
|Title=Sex (of those who are not angels)
|Title=Sex (of those who are not angels)
-
|Description=Sex, or more properly genre, can be used to separate a species into two disjoint subsets: male and female. The two properties (in the sense of DOLCE) are rigid (by nature at list). So it seems to make sense to model the genre of a species, human for example, as two subproperties (subclasses) of dul:NaturalPerson: Woman and Man. An other approach could be tu create a Genre as a quality and then two qualia Male and Female as qualities of Natural Person or what ever other biological entity.
+
|Description=Sex, or more properly genre, can be used to separate a species into two disjoint subsets: male and female. The two properties (in the sense of DOLCE) are rigid (by nature at list). So it seems to make sense to model the genre of a species, human for example, as two subproperties (subclasses) of dul:NaturalPerson: Woman and Man. An other approach could be tu create a :Genre as a quality and then two qualia :Male and :Female. The :Genre dul:isQualityOf dul:NaturalPerson while :Male and :Female should be values available for :Genre. The problem with this approach is that DUL doesn't have Quale as property and there is not a relation between a dul:Quality and some other entity that could be a quale. In DOLCE a dol:quality and a dol:quale could be linked through the dol:hasQuale relation.
}}
}}
{{Graphical representation}}
{{Graphical representation}}

Current revision

Sex (of those who are not angels)

Title: Sex (of those who are not angels)

Description: Sex, or more properly genre, can be used to separate a species into two disjoint subsets: male and female. The two properties (in the sense of DOLCE) are rigid (by nature at list). So it seems to make sense to model the genre of a species, human for example, as two subproperties (subclasses) of dul:NaturalPerson: Woman and Man. An other approach could be tu create a :Genre as a quality and then two qualia :Male and :Female. The :Genre dul:isQualityOf dul:NaturalPerson while :Male and :Female should be values available for :Genre. The problem with this approach is that DUL doesn't have Quale as property and there is not a relation between a dul:Quality and some other entity that could be a quale. In DOLCE a dol:quality and a dol:quale could be linked through the dol:hasQuale relation.

Diagram (this article has no graphical representation)

About

Users Luigi Selmi
Domains
Competency Questions
Scenarios
Proposed Solutions (OWL files)
Related patterns


Additional information

References

Add a reference


List of Modeling Issues | Post a new modeling issue | Add a comment in the discussion page
Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers