Community:The problem with discussion list threads

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: There is an enormous amount of valuable content sitting in discussion list archives that is very raw and hard to digest. If you do manage to find a thread you are interested in, it can tak...)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
There is an enormous amount of valuable content sitting in discussion list archives that is very raw and hard to digest. If you do manage to find a thread you are interested in, it can take a very long time to pour over the many messages to get the punch line.
+
There is an enormous amount of valuable content sitting in discussion list archives. However:
 +
# the same issues get discussed over and over on many different lists;
 +
# the information you want is hard to find;
 +
# if you do find a relevant thread,
 +
## the content is very raw and hard to digest;
 +
## there are usually no summaries, and if there are, they are not easy to find
 +
# it is often easier just to ask the question again, and the cycle continues;
 +
# there is no agreed place to go to find out about modeling issues
-
We believe that after such lively discussions take place, there needs to be a home for the final result, and a way to further refine the ideas for others to benefit from.
+
To address these problems, we have created a home for the final results of lively discussions of ontology modeling issues, and a place for the ideas to be further refined by the community.  It is:
 +
* The [[Community:Main| ontology modeling issues]] page in the ODP Wiki.
-
The [[Community:Main| ontology modeling issues]] page in the ODP Wiki is such a home. In it you will find a number of modeling issues that have already been entered.
+
In it you will find a number of modeling issues that have already been entered.  
We envision the following steps in the evolution of a modeling issue:
We envision the following steps in the evolution of a modeling issue:
# Lively discussion happens on some mailing list.
# Lively discussion happens on some mailing list.
# Someone posts a summary to the list of the key points raised, ideally including the pros and cons of proposed solutions.
# Someone posts a summary to the list of the key points raised, ideally including the pros and cons of proposed solutions.
-
# That summary is also posted to the ODP Wiki as a modeling issue.
+
# That summary is also posted to the ODP Wiki as a modeling issue, and cc'd to other relevant lists
-
# The issue is further discussed and refined there, for the community to contribute to and benefit from.
+
# The issue is further discussed and refined in the ODP Wiki.

Revision as of 05:18, 4 March 2010

There is an enormous amount of valuable content sitting in discussion list archives. However:

  1. the same issues get discussed over and over on many different lists;
  2. the information you want is hard to find;
  3. if you do find a relevant thread,
    1. the content is very raw and hard to digest;
    2. there are usually no summaries, and if there are, they are not easy to find
  4. it is often easier just to ask the question again, and the cycle continues;
  5. there is no agreed place to go to find out about modeling issues

To address these problems, we have created a home for the final results of lively discussions of ontology modeling issues, and a place for the ideas to be further refined by the community. It is:

In it you will find a number of modeling issues that have already been entered.

We envision the following steps in the evolution of a modeling issue:

  1. Lively discussion happens on some mailing list.
  2. Someone posts a summary to the list of the key points raised, ideally including the pros and cons of proposed solutions.
  3. That summary is also posted to the ODP Wiki as a modeling issue, and cc'd to other relevant lists
  4. The issue is further discussed and refined in the ODP Wiki.
Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers