Reviews:Biological Entities Review ValentinaPresutti

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (09:13, 5 August 2009) (view source)
m (Text replace - '|ReviewText=' to '|ReviewSummary=')
 
(18 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 2: Line 2:
|SubmittedBy=ValentinaPresutti
|SubmittedBy=ValentinaPresutti
|ContentOPUnderReview=Biological Entities
|ContentOPUnderReview=Biological Entities
-
|CreationDate=10/04/2008
+
|CreationDate=2008-04-10
|RevisionID=2011
|RevisionID=2011
-
|ReviewText=* The CP needs to be improved.  
+
|ReviewSummary=The CP needs to be improved.
* All ontology elements have to be associated with a description.  
* All ontology elements have to be associated with a description.  
-
* The domain and range is the same for the three object properties:  
+
* The domain and range is the same for the three object properties: [[Submissions:Biological_Entities/biological_entity|biological_entity]].  
-
[[Submissions:Biological_Entities/biological_entity| biological_entity]]. However, there is a local restriction on their usage. It seems to me that domain and range should be personalized for each object properties as the classes you restrict on are disjoint. In other words, you do not want to allow for example the assigment of a value of [[Submissions:Biological_Entities/includesOrder| includesOrder]] for a certain [[Submissions:Biological_Entities/family| family]]. This is now possible as the [[Submissions:Biological_Entities/includesOrder| includesOrder]] property has domain [[Submissions:Biological_Entities/biological_entity| biological_entity]].
+
However, there is a local restriction on their usage. It seems to me that domain and range should be personalized for each object properties as the classes you restrict on are disjoint. In other words, you do not want to allow for example the assigment of a value of [[Submissions:Biological_Entities/includesOrder| includesOrder]] for a certain [[Submissions:Biological_Entities/family|family]]. This is now possible as the [[Submissions:Biological_Entities/includesOrder|includesOrder]] property has domain [[Submissions:Biological_Entities/biological_entity|biological_entity]].
* The CP should import the CP annotation schema (http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl).  
* The CP should import the CP annotation schema (http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl).  
* Which are the competency questions of this CP? And examples?;
* Which are the competency questions of this CP? And examples?;
}}
}}

Current revision


ValentinaPresutti about Biological Entities (Revision ID: Entities?oldid=2011 2011)

Overall suggestion (score):

Review Summary: The CP needs to be improved.
  • All ontology elements have to be associated with a description.
  • The domain and range is the same for the three object properties: biological_entity.

However, there is a local restriction on their usage. It seems to me that domain and range should be personalized for each object properties as the classes you restrict on are disjoint. In other words, you do not want to allow for example the assigment of a value of includesOrder for a certain family. This is now possible as the includesOrder property has domain biological_entity.

Reviewer Confidence:
Problems:
Community Relevance:
Relation to Best Practices:
Reusability:
Relations to Other Patterns:
Overall Understandability:
Clear Problem Description:
Clear Relevance and Consequences:
Clear Figures and Illustrations:
Missing Information:

Posted: 2008-04-10 Last modified: 2009/8/5

All reviews | Add a comment at the bottom of this page
Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers