Reviews:GerdGroener about SynonymOrEquivalence (SOE)
From Odp
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2009/9/8 |SubmittedBy=GerdGroener |ContentOPUnderReview=SynonymOrEquivalence (SOE) |RevisionID=5709 |Score=0 - needs major revision |Rev...) |
Current revision (13:04, 10 September 2009) (view source) (Article updated via HTTP request) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
|ReviewMissing=Provide simple examples: ontology + description. | |ReviewMissing=Provide simple examples: ontology + description. | ||
}} | }} | ||
+ | <noinclude>=====10-09-2009 [[User:GerdGroener]] says:===== | ||
+ | Reviewer Confidence: good | ||
+ | Community Relevance: good | ||
+ | Overall Understandability: good | ||
+ | Clear Problem Description: good | ||
+ | Clear Relevance and Consequences: medium</noinclude> |
Current revision
GerdGroener about SynonymOrEquivalence (SOE) (Revision ID: (SOE)?oldid=5709 5709)
Overall suggestion (score): 0 - needs major revision
Review Summary: The proposed pattern (or anti-pattern) is useful for ontology
engineering, especially for less experienced developers. It focuses a common modeling problem. The proposed anti-pattern is technical sound. However, it is quite simple.
Due to the simplicity of the pattern there are
few discussion issues at WOP.Reviewer Confidence: The reviewer is familiar with ODPs in general and with the described modeling issue and proposed solution.
Problems: Due to the simplicity of the pattern I doubt that the notion of a
design pattern somehow changes to a collection of simple modeling
primitives.Community Relevance: Definitely relevant for the community.
Relation to Best Practices: Relevant to best practice modeling.
Reusability: The pattern is reusable.
Relations to Other Patterns:
Overall Understandability: The motivation of the pattern is well written. Unfortunately there is a breakup in the text.
The overall description of the pattern is well understandable.
Clear Problem Description: The problem is clearly described.
Clear Relevance and Consequences: The relevance of the pattern and its benefits are given.
Clear Figures and Illustrations: Figures are missing.
Missing Information: Provide simple examples: ontology + description.
Posted: 2009/9/8 Last modified: 2009/9/10
10-09-2009 GerdGroener says:
Reviewer Confidence: good Community Relevance: good Overall Understandability: good Clear Problem Description: good Clear Relevance and Consequences: medium