Reviews:GerdGroener about SynonymOrEquivalence (SOE)

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2009/9/8 |SubmittedBy=GerdGroener |ContentOPUnderReview=SynonymOrEquivalence (SOE) |RevisionID=5709 |Score=0 - needs major revision |Rev...)
Current revision (13:04, 10 September 2009) (view source)
(Article updated via HTTP request)
 
Line 28: Line 28:
|ReviewMissing=Provide simple examples: ontology + description.
|ReviewMissing=Provide simple examples: ontology + description.
}}
}}
 +
<noinclude>=====10-09-2009 [[User:GerdGroener]] says:=====
 +
Reviewer Confidence: good
 +
Community Relevance: good
 +
Overall Understandability: good
 +
Clear Problem Description: good
 +
Clear Relevance and Consequences: medium</noinclude>

Current revision


GerdGroener about SynonymOrEquivalence (SOE) (Revision ID: (SOE)?oldid=5709 5709)

Overall suggestion (score): 0 - needs major revision

Review Summary: The proposed pattern (or anti-pattern) is useful for ontology

engineering, especially for less experienced developers. It focuses a common modeling problem. The proposed anti-pattern is technical sound. However, it is quite simple.

Due to the simplicity of the pattern there are

few discussion issues at WOP.
Reviewer Confidence: The reviewer is familiar with ODPs in general and with the described modeling issue and proposed solution.
Problems: Due to the simplicity of the pattern I doubt that the notion of a

design pattern somehow changes to a collection of simple modeling

primitives.
Community Relevance: Definitely relevant for the community.
Relation to Best Practices: Relevant to best practice modeling.
Reusability: The pattern is reusable.
Relations to Other Patterns:
Overall Understandability: The motivation of the pattern is well written. Unfortunately there is a breakup in the text. The overall description of the pattern is well understandable.
Clear Problem Description: The problem is clearly described.
Clear Relevance and Consequences: The relevance of the pattern and its benefits are given.
Clear Figures and Illustrations: Figures are missing.
Missing Information: Provide simple examples: ontology + description.

Posted: 2009/9/8 Last modified: 2009/9/10

All reviews | Add a comment at the bottom of this page
10-09-2009 GerdGroener says:

Reviewer Confidence: good Community Relevance: good Overall Understandability: good Clear Problem Description: good Clear Relevance and Consequences: medium

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers