http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/index.php?title=Reviews:OlafNoppens_about_Inverse_n-ary_relationship&feed=atom&action=historyReviews:OlafNoppens about Inverse n-ary relationship - Revision history2024-03-28T23:44:43ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.13.2http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/index.php?title=Reviews:OlafNoppens_about_Inverse_n-ary_relationship&diff=10107&oldid=prevOlafNoppens: New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/16 |SubmittedBy=OlafNoppens |ContentOPUnderReview=Inverse n-ary relationship |RevisionID=10101 |Score=1 - needs minor revision |R...2010-09-16T13:22:12Z<p>New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/16 |SubmittedBy=OlafNoppens |ContentOPUnderReview=Inverse n-ary relationship |RevisionID=10101 |Score=1 - needs minor revision |R...</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Content OP Proposal Review Template<br />
|CreationDate=2010/9/16<br />
|SubmittedBy=OlafNoppens<br />
|ContentOPUnderReview=Inverse n-ary relationship<br />
|RevisionID=10101<br />
|Score=1 - needs minor revision<br />
|ReviewSummary=This pattern is an extension of the W3C n-ary relationship in that a n-ary realtionship can be summarized in a simple relationship between two individuals.<br />
<br />
I can image that querying a knowledge base is easier - however, I encourage the author to clarify and explain how this aim is achieved (give an example, etc.). However, there is one problem with the pattern and that's the name: the pattern does not describe an inverse n-ary relationship but a special kind of it where only two distinguished individuals are considered with "additional, and probably optional, argument".<br />
<br />
|ReviewConfidence=high<br />
|ReviewProblems=There are two problems: first, it's the name as mentioned above, second I would recommend to use the same notation as in the W3C n-ary relationship which is cited. This would make the difference and the understanding clearer.<br />
|ReviewRelevance=good<br />
|ReviewBestPractice=good<br />
|ReviewRelations=Unfortunately the n-ary relationship is not available on ontologydesignpatterns.org<br />
|ReviewMissing=Example in OWL<br />
}}</div>OlafNoppens