http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/index.php?title=Reviews:OlafNoppens_about_Literal_Reification&feed=atom&action=historyReviews:OlafNoppens about Literal Reification - Revision history2024-03-29T11:44:52ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.13.2http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/index.php?title=Reviews:OlafNoppens_about_Literal_Reification&diff=10109&oldid=prevOlafNoppens: New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/16 |SubmittedBy=OlafNoppens |ContentOPUnderReview=Literal Reification |RevisionID=10062 |Score=2 - accept for certification |Revi...2010-09-16T13:43:02Z<p>New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/16 |SubmittedBy=OlafNoppens |ContentOPUnderReview=Literal Reification |RevisionID=10062 |Score=2 - accept for certification |Revi...</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Content OP Proposal Review Template<br />
|CreationDate=2010/9/16<br />
|SubmittedBy=OlafNoppens<br />
|ContentOPUnderReview=Literal Reification<br />
|RevisionID=10062<br />
|Score=2 - accept for certification<br />
|ReviewSummary=The pattern states how to express reification of literal values in OWL by introducing an intermediate individual (type of Literal) which is connected (via hasLiteralValue) to a blank literal value, or via hasSameLiteralValue to another intermediate individual.<br />
<br />
I have two minor remarks (which depends on each other):<br />
<br />
(1) Literal is a subclass of (= 1 hasLiteralValue). I was wondering whether one could define literal equivalent to (= 1 hasLiteralValue or = 1 hasSameLiteralValue). The idea is that a literal has always either a literal value directly or indirectly (via hasSameLiteralValue)<br />
<br />
(2)SWRL rules are used (in that sense it would also be valid if Literal is defined equivalent to = 1 hasLiteralValue because the SWRL rules guarantee this behaviour). I suggest to add a remark to the description and also to the diagram. Because the application of the pattern assumes SWRL + OWL.<br />
|ReviewConfidence=high<br />
|ReviewRelevance=high<br />
|ReviewReusability=high<br />
|ReviewUnderstandability=good<br />
|ReviewClearProblem=good<br />
|ReviewClearRelevance=good<br />
|ReviewFigures=good - I suggest as mentioned above that the desription and the figures make a reference to rules / SWRL<br />
}}</div>OlafNoppens