Submissions:Class subsumption

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(adding a diagram)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Alignment_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
{{Alignment_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
{{Include Image
{{Include Image
-
|ImageName=class-subsumption  
+
|ImageName=class-subsumption.png
}}
}}
{{Alignment OP General Template
{{Alignment OP General Template

Revision as of 12:53, 27 January 2010


This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 6174

Image:class-subsumption.png

General information

Name Class subsumption
Also known as
Author(s) FrancoisScharffe
SubmittedBy FrancoisScharffe


Description

Domain (if applicable) general
Alignment problem addressed A class in one ontology is a subclass of a class in a second ontology but there is

no functional description of the exact mapping. There is no way of expressing additional properties of the subclass.

Alignment solution This pattern establishes a unidirectional correspondence from a more specific class

in one ontology to a broader class in another ontology. The relation is broadened to allow class expressions in addition to merely class names.

Alignment workflow
Reusable component


Example

Problem example
Solution example <Cell>
<entity1><Class rdf:about="O1:Mammal"/></entity1>
<entity2><Class rdf:about="O2:Vertebrate"/></entity2>
<relation>subsumedBy</relation>

</Cell>

Consequences


Reference

Origin
Known use
Reference
Related to Submissions:Class equivalence
Test


Scenarios

Scenarios about Class subsumption

No scenario is added to this Content OP.

Reviews

Reviews about Class subsumption

There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 6174) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers