Submissions:Co-participation

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: {{Include Image}} {{Content OP Proposal Template |SubmittedBy=User:AldoGangemi |Name=Co-participation |Intent=To represent two objects that both participate in a same event. |Domain=Genera...)
Line 4: Line 4:
|Name=Co-participation
|Name=Co-participation
|Intent=To represent two objects that both participate in a same event.
|Intent=To represent two objects that both participate in a same event.
-
|Domain=General
+
|Domain=Community:General
|CompetencyQuestion=What objects participate in a same event?,
|CompetencyQuestion=What objects participate in a same event?,
Who is involved with whom in something?
Who is involved with whom in something?

Revision as of 18:21, 30 May 2008


General description

Name: Co-participation
Submitted by: User:AldoGangemi
Also Known As:
Intent: To represent two objects that both participate in a same event.
Domains:

Community:General

Competency Questions:
  • What objects participate in a same event?
  • Who is involved with whom in something?
Solution description:
Reusable OWL Building Block: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/coparticipation.owl (887)
Consequences: Any two objects, agents, etc. participating in a same event, even partly or for some limited time, can be related. The pattern provides room for representing participation in that event as well, by importing the Submissions:Participation pattern.

This patterns does not allow to express the complete relation between an event and its participants: this has to be added manually.

Scenarios: Mike and Greta had a great fun together.
Known Uses:
Web References:
Other References:
Examples (OWL files):
Extracted From:
Reengineered From:
Has Components:
Specialization Of:
Related CPs:


Elements

The Co-participation Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:

ObjectProperty coparticipatesWith (owl:ObjectProperty) A symmetric binary relation between objects. It is intedned to represent coparticipation in same event, and such event and the related participation relations should be added separately.

coparticipatesWith page

Reviews

Reviews about Co-participation

There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 1896) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers