Submissions:Context Slices

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Context slices are a way to represent relations that hold in a context in standard OWL and RDF)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Graphical representation header}}
{{Graphical representation header}}
{{Graphical representation
{{Graphical representation
-
|ImageName=Image:Context.-slices-example.jpg
+
|ImageName=Context.-slices-example.jpg
}}
}}
{{Logical OP General Template
{{Logical OP General Template

Revision as of 02:53, 18 August 2010


This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 9837

Graphical representation

Diagram

Image:Context.-slices-example.jpg

General information

Name Context Slices
Also known as
Author(s) Chris Welty
SubmittedBy Chris Welty


Description

Motivation
Aim
Solution description
Elements
Implementation
Reusable component
Component type


Example

Problem example
Pattern solution example
Consequences


Pattern reference

Origin
Known use
Reference
Related ODP
Used in combination with
Test

Additional information

Scenarios

Scenarios about Context Slices

No scenario is added to this Content OP.

Reviews

Reviews about Context Slices
Review article Posted on About revision (current is 9837)
VojtechSvatek about Context Slices 245545616 September 2010 1005810,058
EnricoMotta about Context Slices 245545919 September 2010 1011910,119
ValentinaPresutti about Context Slices 245546323 September 2010 1011910,119

This revision (revision ID 9837) takes in account the reviews: ValentinaPresutti about Context Slices

Other info at evaluation tab


Modeling issues

Modeling issues about Context Slices

There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.


References

Add a reference


Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers