Submissions:Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsumption
From Odp
(Difference between revisions)
RimDJEDIDI (Talk | contribs)
(this logical pattern is proposed as an ontology change alternative to resolve a disjointness inconsistency due a subsumption)
Next diff →
Revision as of 17:31, 21 August 2009
| If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) add a new scenario for Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsumption In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 5572 |
General information
| Name | Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsomption |
|---|---|
| Also known as | |
| Author(s) | Rim Djedidi |
| SubmittedBy | RimDjedidi |
Description
| Motivation | |
|---|---|
| Aim | |
| Solution description | |
| Elements | |
| Implementation | |
| Reusable component | |
| Component type |
Example
| Problem example | |
|---|---|
| Pattern solution example | |
| Consequences |
Pattern reference
| Origin | |
|---|---|
| Known use | |
| Reference | |
| Related ODP | |
| Used in combination with | |
| Test |
Scenarios
Scenarios about Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsumption
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
Reviews about Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsumption
| Review article | Posted on | About revision (current is 5572) |
|---|---|---|
| BorisVillazón-Terrazas about Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsomption | 24550849 September 2009 | 56275,627 |
| WimPeters about Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsomption | 24550849 September 2009 | 57535,753 |
| RinkeHoekstra about Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsumption | 245513025 October 2009 | 58675,867 |
| RinkeHoekstra about Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsumption 2 | 245513025 October 2009 | 58675,867 |
This revision (revision ID 5572) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
