Submissions:Disjoint Classes

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(initial submission)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Alignment_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
{{Alignment_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
{{Include Image
{{Include Image
-
|ImageName=disjoint-classes.png
+
|ImageName=disjoint-classes-correspondences.png
}}
}}
{{Alignment OP General Template
{{Alignment OP General Template

Revision as of 15:27, 1 February 2010


This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 6224

Image:Disjoint-classes-correspondences.png

General information

Name Disjoint Classes
Also known as Class disjointness
Author(s) Francois Scharffe
SubmittedBy FrancoisScharffe


Description

Domain (if applicable) General
Alignment problem addressed Two classes have a different intension, and no intersection of their extension.

Specifying a disjoint correspondence may help a matcher in not proposing any correspondences between these classes.

Alignment solution This pattern establishes correspondence stating that classes are disjoint.
Alignment workflow
Reusable component


Example

Problem example
Solution example Example in EDOAL, the expressive and declarative ontology alignment language
<Cell>
 <entity1><Class rdf:about="O1:Top"/></entity1>
 <entity2><Class rdf:about="O2:Top"/></entity2>
 <relation>Disjoint</relation>
</Cell>
Consequences


Reference

Origin
Known use
Reference
Related to Submissions:DisjointAttributes, Submissions:DisjointInstances
Test


Scenarios

Scenarios about Disjoint Classes

No scenario is added to this Content OP.

Reviews

Reviews about Disjoint Classes

There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 6224) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers