Submissions:Lexico Syntactic ODP corresponding to Equivalence relation between Classes ODP

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (15:02, 12 March 2010) (view source)
m
 
(6 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Lexico-Syntactic_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
{{Lexico-Syntactic_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
{{Lexico-Syntactic ODP Template
{{Lexico-Syntactic ODP Template
-
|Name=Lexico Syntactic ODP corresponding to Equivalence relation between Classes ODP
+
|Name=Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to Equivalence relation between Classes ODP
|Language=English
|Language=English
|AlsoKnownAs=LSP-EQ-EN
|AlsoKnownAs=LSP-EQ-EN
-
|Intent=Recursive expressions in English that state that two classes are equivalent
+
|Intent=Recurrent expressions in English that state that there is a relation of equivalence between two classes
-
|SolutionDescription=The set of Lexico-Syntactic ODPs included here have a direct correspondence to the Logical ODP for the "Equivalence relation between Classes" Logical ODP, describe in the NeOn Technical report D5.1.1 (see Web Reference below).
+
|SolutionDescription=The set of Lexico-Syntactic ODPs included here have a direct correspondence to the Logical ODP for modelling "Equivalence relation between Classes", described in the Technical report D5.1.1, NeOn project Deliverable (see Web Reference below).
|Correspondance=one LSP to one ODP
|Correspondance=one LSP to one ODP
-
|WebReference=http://www.neon-project.org/nw/Deliverables
 
|Author=Elena Montiel-Ponsoda, Guadalupe Aguado de Cea, Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, Asunción Gómez-Pérez
|Author=Elena Montiel-Ponsoda, Guadalupe Aguado de Cea, Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, Asunción Gómez-Pérez
|SubmittedBy=ElenaMontiel-Ponsoda
|SubmittedBy=ElenaMontiel-Ponsoda
}}
}}
{{Case list header}}
{{Case list header}}
 +
{{Has Case Template
 +
|HasCase=1
 +
}}
 +
{{Additional information header}}
{{Reviews about me}}
{{Reviews about me}}
 +
{{Modeling issues about me}}
 +
{{My references}}

Current revision


This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 9276

Description

Name Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to Equivalence relation between Classes ODP
Language English
Also known as LSP-EQ-EN
Intent Recurrent expressions in English that state that there is a relation of equivalence between two classes
Solution description The set of Lexico-Syntactic ODPs included here have a direct correspondence to the Logical ODP for modelling "Equivalence relation between Classes", described in the Technical report D5.1.1, NeOn project Deliverable (see Web Reference below).
Description of the correspondence relation between the LSPs and the ODPs one LSP to one ODP
Related ODP(s)
Web reference
Author(s) Elena Montiel-Ponsoda, Guadalupe Aguado de Cea, Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, Asunción Gómez-Pérez
Submitted by ElenaMontiel-Ponsoda


Cases

The Lexico Syntactic ODP corresponding to Equivalence relation between Classes ODP Lexico-Syntactic ODP includes the following cases (see also abbreviations and symbols used in LSP Formalization):


NL Formulation

  • Poison dart frogs are also known as poison-arrow frogs.

LSP Formalization

NP<class> be (the same as/synonym of)/know as/call/(refer to as) NP<class>

Reusable JAPE code: EQ 1.jape

1 page

Additional information

Reviews

Reviews about Lexico Syntactic ODP corresponding to Equivalence relation between Classes ODP

There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 9276) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab


Modeling issues

Modeling issues about Lexico Syntactic ODP corresponding to Equivalence relation between Classes ODP

There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.


References

Add a reference

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers