Submissions:Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to Defined Classes and SubclassOf relation ODPs

From Odp

Revision as of 17:26, 23 February 2010 by ElenaMontiel-Ponsoda (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 7390

Description

Name Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to Defined Classes and SubclassOf relation ODPs
Language English
Also known as LSP-DC-SC-EN
Intent Recurrent expressions in English that define a class by stating the relation between the class and the (super)class it belongs to, and making explicit the feature or property that makes the class different from the superclass.
Solution description The set of Lexico-Syntactic ODPs included here have a direct correspondence to the Logical ODPs for modelling "Defined Clases" and the "SubclassOf relation", described in the Technical report D5.1.1, NeOn project Deliverable (see Web Reference below).
Description of the correspondence relation between the LSPs and the ODPs one LSP to the combination of several ODPs
Related ODP(s)
Web reference http://www.neon-project.org/nw/Deliverables
Author(s) Elena Montiel-Ponsoda, Guadalupe Aguado de Cea, Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, Asunción Gómez-Pérez
Submitted by ElenaMontiel-Ponsoda


Cases

The Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to Defined Classes and SubclassOf relation ODPs Lexico-Syntactic ODP includes the following cases (see also abbreviations and symbols used in LSP Formalization):


Reviews

Reviews about Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to Defined Classes and SubclassOf relation ODPs

There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 7390) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers