Submissions:Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to LocationODP

From Odp

Revision as of 17:05, 25 February 2010 by ElenaMontiel-Ponsoda (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 7664

Description

Name Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to LocationODP
Language English
Also known as LSP-LO-EN
Intent Recurrent expressions in English that state a simple bynary relation between an object and its location
Solution description The set of Lexico-Syntactic ODPs included here have a direct correspondence to the Content ODP for modelling "Location".
Description of the correspondence relation between the LSPs and the ODPs one LSP to one ODP
Related ODP(s) Submissions:http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submissions:Location
Web reference http://www.neon-project.org/web-content/images/Publications/neon_2008_d2.5.1.pdf
Author(s) Elena Montiel-Ponsoda, Guadalupe Aguado de Cea, Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, Asunción Gómez-Pérez
Submitted by ElenaMontiel-Ponsoda


Cases

The Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to LocationODP Lexico-Syntactic ODP includes the following cases (see also abbreviations and symbols used in LSP Formalization):


NL Formulation

  • The school is located in Bocas Town.
  • T-cadherin is located in the nucleus and in the centrosomes.

LSP Formalization

NP<place> be/has (locate/find/set/situate/place/(a site)) in [(NP<location >,)* and] NP<location>

Reusable JAPE code: LO_1.jape

1 page


Reviews

Reviews about Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to LocationODP

There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 7664) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers