Submissions:Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to SubclassOf relation, Disjoint Classes, and Exhaustive Classes ODPs

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (20:12, 5 March 2010) (view source)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown.)
Line 24: Line 24:
|HasCase=4
|HasCase=4
}}
}}
 +
{{Additional information header}}
{{Reviews about me}}
{{Reviews about me}}
 +
{{Modeling issues about me}}
 +
{{My references}}

Current revision


This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 8987

Description

Name Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to SubclassOf relation, Disjoint Classes, and Exhaustive Classes ODPs
Language English
Also known as LSP-SC-Di-EC-EN
Intent Recurrent expressions in English that state a relation between a (super)class and all the distinct (sub)classes that belong to the superclass.
Solution description The set of Lexico-Syntactic ODPs included here have a direct correspondence to the Logical ODPs for modelling "SubclassOf relation", "Disjoint Classes", and "Exhaustive Classes" described in the Technical report D5.1.1, NeOn project Deliverable (see Web Reference below).
Description of the correspondence relation between the LSPs and the ODPs one LSP to the combination of several ODPs
Related ODP(s)
Web reference http://www.neon-project.org/nw/Deliverables
Author(s) Elena Montiel-Ponsoda, Guadalupe Aguado de Cea, Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, Asunción Gómez-Pérez
Submitted by ElenaMontiel-Ponsoda


Cases

The Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to SubclassOf relation, Disjoint Classes, and Exhaustive Classes ODPs Lexico-Syntactic ODP includes the following cases (see also abbreviations and symbols used in LSP Formalization):


NL Formulation

  • Animals are either vertebrates or invertebrates.

LSP Formalization

NP<superclass> be/CATV [either] NP<subclass> or/and NP<subclass>

Reusable JAPE code: SC_Di_EC_3.jape

1 page

NL Formulation

  • Membrane proteins are classified into two major categories, integral proteins and peripheral proteins.

LSP Formalization

NP<superclass> CATV CD CN-CATV [PARA] [(NP<subclass>,)*and] NP <subclass>

Reusable JAPE code: SC_Di_EC_4_5.jape

2 page

NL Formulation

  • There are CD CN-CATV NP<superclass> [PARA] [(NP<subclass>,)* and] NP<subclass>

LSP Formalization

There are two types of narcotic analgesics: the opiates and the opioids.

Reusable JAPE code: -

3 page

NL Formulation

  • Marine mammals are divided into three orders: Carnivora, Sirenia and Cetacea.

LSP Formalization

NP<superclass> be divided/separate in/into CD CN-CATV [PARA] [(NP<subclass >,)* and] NP<subclass>

Reusable JAPE code: SC_Di_EC_2.jape

4 page

Additional information

Reviews

Reviews about Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to SubclassOf relation, Disjoint Classes, and Exhaustive Classes ODPs

There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 8987) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab


Modeling issues

Modeling issues about Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to SubclassOf relation, Disjoint Classes, and Exhaustive Classes ODPs

There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.


References

Add a reference


Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers