Submissions:Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to SubclassOf relation, Disjoint Classes, and Exhaustive Classes ODPs

From Odp

Revision as of 17:31, 23 February 2010 by ElenaMontiel-Ponsoda (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 7391

Description

Name Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to SubclassOf relation, Disjoint Classes, and Exhaustive Classes ODPs
Language English
Also known as LSP-SC-Di-EC-EN
Intent Recurrent expressions in English that state a relation between a (super)class and all the distinct (sub)classes that belong to the superclass.
Solution description The set of Lexico-Syntactic ODPs included here have a direct correspondence to the Logical ODPs for modelling "SubclassOf relation", "Disjoint Classes", and "Exhaustive Classes" described in the Technical report D5.1.1, NeOn project Deliverable (see Web Reference below).
Description of the correspondence relation between the LSPs and the ODPs one LSP to the combination of several ODPs
Related ODP(s)
Web reference http://www.neon-project.org/nw/Deliverables
Author(s) Elena Montiel-Ponsoda, Guadalupe Aguado de Cea, Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, Asunción Gómez-Pérez
Submitted by ElenaMontiel-Ponsoda


Cases

The Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to SubclassOf relation, Disjoint Classes, and Exhaustive Classes ODPs Lexico-Syntactic ODP includes the following cases (see also abbreviations and symbols used in LSP Formalization):


Reviews

Reviews about Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to SubclassOf relation, Disjoint Classes, and Exhaustive Classes ODPs

There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 7391) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers