Submissions:Main

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (16:04, 3 February 2010) (view source)
 
(27 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
This area aims at collecting Ontology Design Pattern Proposals from ODP.org users.
+
<noinclude>[[Image:ListPatterns.png|70px]]
 +
</noinclude>
 +
This area aims at collecting Ontology Design Pattern proposals from ODP users.
-
At the moment you can find Content OP proposals.
+
After the author has finished the submission and asked for a review, the proposals are assigned to at least two members of the ODP Quality Committee,
-
Such proposals are assigned to at least two members of the ODP.org Quality Committee,
+
who are expected to provide a review.  
who are expected to provide a review.  
-
Positive reviews are accompanied with guidelines for fixing possible problems in the Content OP.
+
Positive reviews can be accompanied with guidelines for fixing possible problems of the proposed Content OP.
-
Once such issues are addressed, the Content OP can be published in the [[Catalogue:Main| Catalogue]]
+
-
+
-
Below you find the current Content OP proposals.
+
-
=== Content OP Proposals ===
+
Once such problems have been addressed, the proposed Content OP can be certified and published in the [[Catalogue:Main| official catalogue]].
-
<ask>[[Category:ContentOPProposal]]</ask>
+
 
 +
See the submissions list:
 +
 
 +
* [[Submissions:ContentOPs| Content ODPs]]
 +
* [[Submissions:ReengineeringODPs| Reengineering ODPs]]
 +
* [[Submissions:AlignmentODPs|Alignment ODPs]]
 +
* [[Submissions:LogicalODPs|Logical ODPs]]
 +
* [[Submissions:ArchitecturalODPs|Architectural ODPs]]
 +
* [[Submissions:LexicoSyntacticODPs|Lexico-Syntactic ODPs]]

Current revision

This area aims at collecting Ontology Design Pattern proposals from ODP users.

After the author has finished the submission and asked for a review, the proposals are assigned to at least two members of the ODP Quality Committee, who are expected to provide a review.

Positive reviews can be accompanied with guidelines for fixing possible problems of the proposed Content OP.

Once such problems have been addressed, the proposed Content OP can be certified and published in the official catalogue.

See the submissions list:

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers