Submissions:RelativeRelationship

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 10: Line 10:
|Domain=Parts and Collections, Decision-making,
|Domain=Parts and Collections, Decision-making,
|ContentODPDescription=Gypsum is cheaper to replace than brick.
|ContentODPDescription=Gypsum is cheaper to replace than brick.
-
|ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=[https://curate.nd.edu/downloads/9p29086355b Notre Dame]
+
|ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=[https://curate.nd.edu/downloads/9p29086355b]
}}
}}
{{Element list header}}
{{Element list header}}

Revision as of 19:44, 11 October 2015


This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 12364

Graphical representation

Diagram

Image:RelativeRelationshipPattern.jpg

General description

Name: RelativeRelationship
Submitted by: AdilaKrisnadhi
Also Known As:
Intent: For dynamically conceptualizing, establishing, tracking, and updating relative relationships and dependencies between entities (real or representational) of a physical, temporal, and/or importance scope.
Domains:

Parts and Collections, Decision-making

Competency Questions:
Solution description: Gypsum is cheaper to replace than brick.
Reusable OWL Building Block: [1] (0)
Consequences:
Scenarios:
Known Uses:
Web References:
Other References:
Examples (OWL files):
Extracted From:
Reengineered From:
Has Components:
Specialization Of:
Related CPs:


Elements

The RelativeRelationship Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:

Additional information

See human-readable description at https://curate.nd.edu/concern/datasets/9k41zc79w4r

Scenarios

Scenarios about RelativeRelationship

No scenario is added to this Content OP.

Reviews

Reviews about RelativeRelationship

There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 12364) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab


Modeling issues

Modeling issues about RelativeRelationship

There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.


References

Add a reference


Submission to event

WOP:2015

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers