Training:PhD Course on Computational Ontologies @ University of Bologna 2011/Ontology Testing/ArefniaScarlato

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 16: Line 16:
|-
|-
|}
|}
 +
 +
 +
Q1:
 +
What method/approach are you using (give a brief description)?
 +
 +
Abbiamo provato a tradurre in query sparql le competency questions.
 +
 +
 +
Q2:
 +
How did you apply the method, i.e. what did you do, what steps did you take?
 +
 +
Abbiamo inserito le query sparql nel TopBraid Sparql interpreter
 +
 +
 +
Q3:
 +
What was the result of applying this method? What mistakes did you find? (give a summary of the type of mistakes you were able to detect.
 +
 +
We don't have find any mistakes.
 +
 +
 +
 +
Q4:
 +
How long time did it take you to test the ontology using each approach you tried? Approximate the time you spent on it!
 +
 +
40 minutes.
 +
 +
 +
Q5:
 +
Do you see any limitations or problems with the way you tested the ontology? Would you be able to find any kind of error/mistake/problem using that method? Why/why not?
 +
 +
Maybe could be exist a method to generate directly query sparql from the natural language.

Revision as of 15:43, 10 May 2011

Testing Exercise - document your work on methods used
Number Requirement tested Method used Test applied Error(s) found Suggestions/ideas for solution Additional notes
0 We tested our ontologies , asking what instruments does a certain person play. SELECT {?y

WHERE :Chad_Smith :playsInstrument ?y } || || || ||

1
2
3
4


Q1: What method/approach are you using (give a brief description)?

Abbiamo provato a tradurre in query sparql le competency questions.


Q2: How did you apply the method, i.e. what did you do, what steps did you take?

Abbiamo inserito le query sparql nel TopBraid Sparql interpreter


Q3: What was the result of applying this method? What mistakes did you find? (give a summary of the type of mistakes you were able to detect.

We don't have find any mistakes.


Q4: How long time did it take you to test the ontology using each approach you tried? Approximate the time you spent on it!

40 minutes.


Q5: Do you see any limitations or problems with the way you tested the ontology? Would you be able to find any kind of error/mistake/problem using that method? Why/why not?

Maybe could be exist a method to generate directly query sparql from the natural language.

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers