Training:PhD Course on Computational Ontologies @ University of Bologna 2011/Ontology Testing/ArefniaScarlato

From Odp

Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (16:00, 10 May 2011) (view source)
 
Line 16: Line 16:
|-
|-
|}
|}
-
 
-
 
-
Q1:
 
-
What method/approach are you using (give a brief description)?
 
-
 
-
Abbiamo provato a tradurre in query sparql le competency questions.
 
-
 
-
 
-
Q2:
 
-
How did you apply the method, i.e. what did you do, what steps did you take?
 
-
 
-
Abbiamo inserito le query sparql nel TopBraid Sparql interpreter
 
-
 
-
 
-
Q3:
 
-
What was the result of applying this method? What mistakes did you find? (give a summary of the type of mistakes you were able to detect.
 
-
 
-
We don't have find any mistakes.
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
Q4:
 
-
How long time did it take you to test the ontology using each approach you tried? Approximate the time you spent on it!
 
-
 
-
40 minutes.
 
-
 
-
 
-
Q5:
 
-
Do you see any limitations or problems with the way you tested the ontology? Would you be able to find any kind of error/mistake/problem using that method? Why/why not?
 
-
 
-
Maybe could be exist a method to generate directly query sparql from the natural language.
 

Current revision

Testing Exercise - document your work on methods used
Number Requirement tested Method used Test applied Error(s) found Suggestions/ideas for solution Additional notes
0 We tested our ontologies , asking what instruments does a certain person play. SELECT {?y

WHERE :Chad_Smith :playsInstrument ?y } || || || ||

1
2
3
4
Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers