This pattern has been certified.
Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here
|
Last modified date is: 2010-03-08
|
Graphical representation
Diagram
(this article has no graphical representation)
General description
Name:
|
informationObjectsAndRepresentationLanguages
|
Submitted by:
|
AldoGangemi
|
Also Known As:
|
|
Intent:
|
-
|
Domains:
|
|
Competency Questions:
|
|
Solution description:
|
-
|
Reusable OWL Building Block:
|
1 (419)
|
Consequences:
|
|
Scenarios:
|
|
Known Uses:
|
|
Web References:
|
|
Other References:
|
|
Examples (OWL files):
|
|
Extracted From:
|
|
Reengineered From:
|
|
Has Components:
|
|
Specialization Of:
|
|
Related CPs:
|
|
Elements
The InformationObjectsAndRepresentationLanguages Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
conceptualizes (owl:ObjectProperty) A relation stating that an Agent is internally representing a SocialObject . E.g., 'John believes in the conspiracy theory'; 'Niels Bohr created the solar-system metaphor for the atomic theory'; 'Jacques assumes all swans are white'; 'the task force members share the attack plan'.
conceptualizes page
formallyRepresents (owl:ObjectProperty) The relation between formal expressions, and anything that they are supposed to represent.
E.g., 'the predicate 'MariachiInTijuana' formallyRepresents the dul:Collection of all mariachis in Tijuana'; 'the equivalence relation '<=>' formallyRepresents the concept of two entities having the same properties'.
Notice that formal expressions are formally interpreted by instances of dul:FormalEntity
formallyRepresents page
isConceptualizedBy (owl:ObjectProperty) A relation stating that an Agent is internally representing a Description . E.g., 'John believes in the conspiracy theory'; 'Niels Bohr created a solar-system metaphor for his atomic theory'; 'Jacques assumes all swans are white'; 'the task force shares the attack plan'.
isConceptualizedBy page
isFormallyRepresentedIn (owl:ObjectProperty) The relation between formal expressions, and anything that they are supposed to represent.
E.g., 'the predicate 'MariachiInTijuana' formallyRepresents the dul:Collection of all mariachis in Tijuana'; 'the equivalence relation '<=>' formallyRepresents the concept of two entities having the same properties'.
Notice that formal expressions are formally interpreted by instances of dul:FormalEntity
isFormallyRepresentedIn page
FormalExpression (owl:Class) Any information object represented in a FormalLanguage, usually having a formal interpretation by a dul:FormalEntity, and used to formally represent any Entity
FormalExpression page
FormalLanguage (owl:Class) A formal language, created by some human, with a fixed grammar, and usually with an explicit formal semantics (i.e. its elements have an interpretation wrt to formal entities such as sets, categories, etc.).
FormalLanguage page
IconicLanguage (owl:Class) A language made up of graphical elements. It can be natural, artificial, and even formal.
IconicLanguage page
IconicObject (owl:Class) An information object represented in an IconicLanguage
IconicObject page
Language (owl:Class) A natural or artificial language, provided with an alphabet (or vocabulary) and combinatorial rules. In the case of natural languages, their components are 'temporary' and 'reconstructed' out of actual usage. For example, a grammar for a natural language has the status of a theory for that language, and alternative ones can exist (e.g. generative vs. construction grammars).
Another distinction, between the general (systemic) rules for a language, and the local (contextual) rules for e.g. a certain context, speaker, place, etc., can be made separately.
The most comprehensive classification of languages ha probably been made by Umberto Eco, based on the production modes of the 'signs' that are represented in a certain language. It uses several semiotic dimensions, and will be modeled in a forthcoming ontology.
Language page
LinguisticObject (owl:Class) An information object represented in a NaturalLanguage
LinguisticObject page
NaturalLanguage (owl:Class) A natural language, evolved and used in a community across time.
Natural languages components are 'temporary' and 'reconstructed' out of actual usage. For example, a grammar for a (part of a) natural language has the status of a theory for that language, but alternative ones can exist (e.g. generative vs. construction grammars).
NaturalLanguage page
Additional information
Scenarios
Scenarios about InformationObjectsAndRepresentationLanguages
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
Reviews about InformationObjectsAndRepresentationLanguages
There is no review about this proposal.
Some subquery has no valid condition.
This revision (revision ID 9094) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
Modeling issues about InformationObjectsAndRepresentationLanguages
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
Some subquery has no valid condition.
References
Add a reference