Diagram
| Name: | SpeciesConservation |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | EvaBlomqvist |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | This pattern intend to represent a description of the conservation status of aquatic species. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: | |
| Solution description: | -- |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | 1 (399) |
| Consequences: | The conservation status is simply represented as a string, there are no restrictions on how to express the status, thereby an additional convention on how to express this in natural language could be needed if a uniform naming of status levels is desired. |
| Scenarios: | Give me the species for which conservation status contains 'Vulnerable'; Give me the species for which conservation status is 'vulnerable'; Give me the conservation status for species 'Ostrica gigas |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
The SpeciesConservation Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Mappable to fi:Species, fi:SpeciesRef, fi:SpeciesFeature, etc.
It has related axioms from FIGIS Schema that are included in the classes linked to the fi:Species class, such as fi:SpeciesRef (holding association with fi:AqResRef, which holds association with fi:WaterAreaRef).
(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
This revision (revision ID 9125) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab