Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|ReviewText=The CP needs to be improved. | |ReviewText=The CP needs to be improved. | ||
All ontology elements have to be associated with a description. | All ontology elements have to be associated with a description. | ||
− | The domain and range is the same for the three object properties: | + | The domain and range is the same for the three object properties: ''Submissions:Biological_Entities/biological_entity''. However, there is a local restriction on their usage. It seems to me that domain and range should be personalized for each object properties as the classes you restrict on are disjoint. In other words, you do not want to allow for example the assigment of a value of ''Submissions:Biological_Entities/includesOrder'' for a certain ''Submissions:Biological_Entities/family''. |
− | This is now possible as the | + | This is now possible as the ''Submissions:Biological_Entities/includesOrder'' property has domain ''Submissions:Biological_Entities/biological_entity''.The CP should import the CP annotation schema (http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl). |
Which are the competency questions of this CP? And an example? | Which are the competency questions of this CP? And an example? | ||
}} | }} |
{{#reviewabout:Submissions:Submissions:Biological Entities|}}
Overall suggestion (score):
Posted: Last modified: 2008/05/6