m (Review has been assigned.)
m (Text replace - 'WOP2009:Main' to 'WOP:2009')
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
 
{{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
{{Include Image
+
{{Graphical representation header}}
 +
{{Graphical representation
 
|ImageName=ConceptGroupPattern.jpg
 
|ImageName=ConceptGroupPattern.jpg
 
}}
 
}}
Line 14: Line 15:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Element list header}}
 
{{Element list header}}
 
+
{{Additional information header}}
 +
[[Category:Review assigned]]
 
{{Scenarios about me}}
 
{{Scenarios about me}}
 
{{Reviews about me}}
 
{{Reviews about me}}
 +
{{Modeling issues about me}}
 +
{{My references}}
 
{{Submission to event
 
{{Submission to event
|Event=WOP2009:Main
+
|Event=WOP:2009
 
}}
 
}}
 
 
[[Category:Review assigned]]
 
[[Category:Review assigned]]
 

Latest revision as of 08:29, 31 May 2010

Warning.gif

Warning!

This is an old revision. Go to current revision

Certified.png
This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

Working.gif Last modified date is: 2010-05-31

Graphical representation

Diagram

ConceptGroupPattern.jpg

General description

Name: ConceptGroup
Submitted by: Pierre-YvesVandenbussche
Also Known As:
Intent: This CP allows designers to represent concept group defined by intention (all concepts satisfying group membership condition) or by extension (all concepts referring a group).
Domains:

Parts and Collections, Vocabulary

Competency Questions:
Solution description: How a group entity stands alone?, How to represent either a vocabulary subset, a cross vocabulary subset or a whole vocabulary?, How to represent group concept members?
Reusable OWL Building Block: 1 (769)
Consequences:
Scenarios: Used to describe whole vocabulary entity or vocabulary concepts subset. Compliant with RefSets in SNOMED-CT or themes in GEMET.
Known Uses:
Web References:
Other References:
Examples (OWL files):
Extracted From:
Reengineered From:
Has Components:
Specialization Of:
Related CPs:



Elements

The ConceptGroup Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:

Additional information

Scenarios

Scenarios about ConceptGroup

No scenario is added to this Content OP.

Reviews

Reviews about ConceptGroup
There is no review about this proposal.
Some subquery has no valid condition.

This revision (revision ID 9701) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab


Modeling issues

Modeling issues about ConceptGroup
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
Some subquery has no valid condition.


References

Add a reference


Timer.png Submission to event

WOP:2009

The page [[Bootstrap:Footer]] was not found.