|
|
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |} | | |} |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Q1:
| |
| − | What method/approach are you using (give a brief description)?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Abbiamo provato a tradurre in query sparql le competency questions.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Q2:
| |
| − | How did you apply the method, i.e. what did you do, what steps did you take?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Abbiamo inserito le query sparql nel TopBraid Sparql interpreter
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Q3:
| |
| − | What was the result of applying this method? What mistakes did you find? (give a summary of the type of mistakes you were able to detect.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | We don't have find any mistakes.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Q4:
| |
| − | How long time did it take you to test the ontology using each approach you tried? Approximate the time you spent on it!
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 40 minutes.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Q5:
| |
| − | Do you see any limitations or problems with the way you tested the ontology? Would you be able to find any kind of error/mistake/problem using that method? Why/why not?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Maybe could be exist a method to generate directly query sparql from the natural language.
| |
'Ontology Design Patterns'