Difference between revisions of "'Ontology Design Patterns':Tasks/Distinguishing Open and QC Reviews" < 'Ontology Design Patterns':Tasks

(Article updated via HTTP request)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
* Motivations are the following:
 
* Motivations are the following:
 
** The regular discussion pages are not effectively perceived from users.  
 
** The regular discussion pages are not effectively perceived from users.  
−
** We <del>want</del> now have actually an open review mechanism as well as an official one.   
+
** We want have an open review mechanism as well as an official one.   
−
** <del>It is bad that a user is faced with an error page when his/her intent is to post a comment on a wiki. At least (s)he should be redirected to the correct page where is allowed to post. However, t would be much better to make such process transparent to the user (as described above).</del> -fixed
+
** It is bad that a user is faced with an error page when his/her intent is to post a comment on a wiki. At least (s)he should be redirected to the correct page where is allowed to post. However, t would be much better to make such process transparent to the user (as described above).
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Task Template
 
{{Task Template
 +
|TaskType=Improvement
 
|SubmittedBy=ValentinaPresutti
 
|SubmittedBy=ValentinaPresutti
 +
|ParentTask=Tasks/Review procedure
 
|Status=fixed
 
|Status=fixed
 +
|Priority=High
 
}}
 
}}
 
=====17-06-2008 [[User:EnricoDaga]] says:=====
 
=====17-06-2008 [[User:EnricoDaga]] says:=====
 
<del>But if you are not a member of the QC you face an error page.</del> (fixed -enrico)
 
<del>But if you are not a member of the QC you face an error page.</del> (fixed -enrico)
 +
=====17-06-2008 [[User:EnricoDaga]] says:=====
 +
<del>It is bad that a user is faced with an error page when his/her intent is to post a comment on a wiki. At least (s)he should be redirected to the correct page where is allowed to post. However, t would be much better to make such process transparent to the user (as described above).</del> -fixed
 +
 +
This was a bug in the wiki code.

Latest revision as of 17:09, 17 June 2008

Tasks/Distinguishing Open and QC Reviews

Title: Distinguishing Open and QC Reviews

Description: Each Proposed Content OP has the possibility to be reviewed from its page by clicking on 'post a review'. But if you are not a member of the QC you face an error page.

I would like to fix this in the following way:

    • We allow all registered user to post a review but we distinguish QC reviews from open ones.
    • Is it possible to have only one link in the page (the one that is already there) and to redirect the user to either an 'Open Review' if (s)he is not a QC member, or to the official review if (s)he is a QC member?
  • Motivations are the following:
    • The regular discussion pages are not effectively perceived from users.
    • We want have an open review mechanism as well as an official one.
    • It is bad that a user is faced with an error page when his/her intent is to post a comment on a wiki. At least (s)he should be redirected to the correct page where is allowed to post. However, t would be much better to make such process transparent to the user (as described above).


Sub-tasks: This task has no sub-tasks

Development | .| | Add a comment at the bottom of this page
17-06-2008 EnricoDaga says:

But if you are not a member of the QC you face an error page. (fixed -enrico)

17-06-2008 EnricoDaga says:

It is bad that a user is faced with an error page when his/her intent is to post a comment on a wiki. At least (s)he should be redirected to the correct page where is allowed to post. However, t would be much better to make such process transparent to the user (as described above). -fixed

This was a bug in the wiki code.

Retrieved from "http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/index.php?title=%27Ontology_Design_Patterns%27:Tasks/Distinguishing_Open_and_QC_Reviews&oldid=2527"
The page [[Bootstrap:Footer]] was not found.