(Article updated via HTTP request)
(Article updated via HTTP request)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
''Are we sure?'': I like the current solution, does not make the page too big (and difficult to read...) [[User:EnricoDaga|enrico]]
 
''Are we sure?'': I like the current solution, does not make the page too big (and difficult to read...) [[User:EnricoDaga|enrico]]
 
=====24-06-2008 [[User:Admin]] says:=====
 
=====24-06-2008 [[User:Admin]] says:=====
Sorry I meant we have to allow the creation of the page in the same way we create ontology elements. However, I would not include the page, I would just include links to associated scenarios.
+
We need a link to related scenarios, otherwise it does not make to have them. We do not need page inclusion.
 +
<noinclude>=====9-07-2008 [[User:EnricoDaga]] says:=====
 +
To see the changes in the pattern's page is necesary to edit & save the proposal's pattern article.</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 12:06, 9 July 2008

Tasks/Linking scenarios in the proposal's page

Title: Linking scenarios in the proposal's page

Description: Adding a link for adding scenarios, and including the list of the related scenarios in the proposl's page (with page-inclusion, same as elements)


Sub-tasks: This task has no sub-tasks

Development | .| | Add a comment at the bottom of this page
17-06-2008 EnricoDaga says:

About:

use (with page-inclusion, same as elements).

Are we sure?: I like the current solution, does not make the page too big (and difficult to read...) enrico

24-06-2008 Admin says:

We need a link to related scenarios, otherwise it does not make to have them. We do not need page inclusion.

9-07-2008 EnricoDaga says:

To see the changes in the pattern's page is necesary to edit & save the proposal's pattern article.

The page [[Bootstrap:Footer]] was not found.