(→24-06-2008 User:Admin says:) |
EnricoDaga (Talk | contribs) (Article updated via HTTP request) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=====24-06-2008 [[User:Admin]] says:===== | =====24-06-2008 [[User:Admin]] says:===== | ||
We need a link to related scenarios, otherwise it does not make to have them. We do not need page inclusion. | We need a link to related scenarios, otherwise it does not make to have them. We do not need page inclusion. | ||
| + | <noinclude>=====9-07-2008 [[User:EnricoDaga]] says:===== | ||
| + | To see the changes in the pattern's page is necesary to edit & save the proposal's pattern article.</noinclude> | ||
Title: Linking scenarios in the proposal's page
Sub-tasks: This task has no sub-tasks
About:
use (with page-inclusion, same as elements).
Are we sure?: I like the current solution, does not make the page too big (and difficult to read...) enrico
We need a link to related scenarios, otherwise it does not make to have them. We do not need page inclusion.
To see the changes in the pattern's page is necesary to edit & save the proposal's pattern article.
'Ontology Design Patterns'