EnricoDaga (Talk | contribs) m |
|||
| (54 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} | ||
| + | {{Graphical representation header}} | ||
| + | {{Graphical representation | ||
| + | |ImageName=Situation.jpg | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Content OP Proposal Template | {{Content OP Proposal Template | ||
| + | |SubmittedBy=AldoGangemi | ||
|Name=Situation | |Name=Situation | ||
| − | |Intent=To represent | + | |ContentODPAlsoKnownAs=situation |
| − | |Domain= | + | |Intent=To represent contexts or situations, and the things that are contextualized. |
| − | |CompetencyQuestion= | + | |Domain=General |
| − | |ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://www. | + | |CompetencyQuestion=What is the context or situation of something? What are the things present in this context or situation? |
| − | |Consequences= | + | |ContentODPDescription=- |
| − | + | |ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl | |
| − | + | |Consequences=We can contextualize things that have something in common, or are associated: a same place, time, view, causal link, systemic dependence, etc. | |
| − | | | + | We can also reify n-ary relations as situations. |
| − | + | |Scenario=The lecture was held in January 1921 by Bela Fleck, with some physicians in the audience making questions, in a very relaxed athmosphere. | |
| − | |ExtractedFrom=http://www. | + | |ExtractedFrom=http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | {{Element list header}} | ||
{{Has Element Template | {{Has Element Template | ||
| − | |HasElement= | + | |HasElement=hasSetting |
}} | }} | ||
{{Has Element Template | {{Has Element Template | ||
| − | |HasElement= | + | |HasElement=isSettingFor |
}} | }} | ||
{{Has Element Template | {{Has Element Template | ||
| − | |HasElement= | + | |HasElement=Situation |
}} | }} | ||
| + | {{Additional information header}} | ||
| + | (type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology | ||
| + | |||
| + | (versionInfo): Created by Aldo Gangemi and Valentina Presutti | ||
| + | |||
| + | (imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl[[Category:Waiting for review]] | ||
| + | {{Scenarios about me}} | ||
| + | {{Reviews about me}} | ||
| + | {{Modeling issues about me}} | ||
| + | {{My references}} | ||
|
Last modified date is: 2010-03-08 |
Diagram
| Name: | Situation |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | AldoGangemi |
| Also Known As: | situation |
| Intent: | To represent contexts or situations, and the things that are contextualized. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: | |
| Solution description: | - |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | 1 (770) |
| Consequences: | We can contextualize things that have something in common, or are associated: a same place, time, view, causal link, systemic dependence, etc.
We can also reify n-ary relations as situations. |
| Scenarios: | The lecture was held in January 1921 by Bela Fleck, with some physicians in the audience making questions, in a very relaxed athmosphere. |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
The Situation Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
hasSetting (owl:ObjectProperty) A relation between entities and situations, e.g. 'this morning I've prepared my coffee with a new fantastic Arabica' (i.e.: (an amount of) a new fantastic Arabica hasSetting the preparation of my coffee this morning).
hasSetting page
Situation (owl:Class) A view on a set of entities. It can be seen as a 'relational context', reifying a relation.
For example, a PlanExecution is a context including some actions executed by agents according to certain parameters and expected tasks to be achieved from a Plan; a DiagnosedSituation is a context of observed entities that is interpreted on the basis of a Diagnosis, etc.
Situation is also able to represent reified n-ary relations, where isSettingFor is the top-level relation for all binary projections of the n-ary relation. If used in a transformation pattern for n-ary relations, the designer should take care of:
- creating only one situation for each instance of an n-ary relation, otherwise the 'identification constraint' (Calvanese et al., IJCAI 2001) could be violated
- adding an 'exact cardinality' restriction corresponding to the arity of the n-ary relation, otherwise the designer would actually represent a polymorphic relation.
Situation page(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
(versionInfo): Created by Aldo Gangemi and Valentina Presutti
(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
This revision (revision ID 9122) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
'Ontology Design Patterns'
