AldoGangemi (Talk | contribs) |
EnricoDaga (Talk | contribs) m (Text replace - '|ReviewText=' to '|ReviewSummary=') |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|RevisionID=3686 | |RevisionID=3686 | ||
|Score=2 - need major revision | |Score=2 - need major revision | ||
− | | | + | |ReviewSummary=After Aureliano's evaluation, here you need to link vesseltypes to geartypes to species, therefore the pattern requires at least three classes, with relations between vesseltypes to geartypes, and geartypes to species respectively. |
The synthetic relation can then be instantiated by using SPARQL CONSTRUCT. | The synthetic relation can then be instantiated by using SPARQL CONSTRUCT. | ||
Alternatively, it can be generated with a SWRL rule, or by using an OWL2 alternate pattern, in which a property chain is defined (best practice). | Alternatively, it can be generated with a SWRL rule, or by using an OWL2 alternate pattern, in which a property chain is defined (best practice). | ||
}} | }} |
{{#reviewabout:Submissions:VesselSpecies|}}
Overall suggestion (score): 2 - need major revision
The synthetic relation can then be instantiated by using SPARQL CONSTRUCT.
Alternatively, it can be generated with a SWRL rule, or by using an OWL2 alternate pattern, in which a property chain is defined (best practice).