Difference between revisions of "Community:FrancoisScharffe about ConceptGroup"

Revision as of 11:56, 11 September 2009

FrancoisScharffe about ConceptGroup (Revision ID: 5799)

Overall suggestion (score): 0 - needs major revision

Review Summary:

Reviewer Confidence:

Problems:

Community Relevance:

Relation to Best Practices:

Reusability:

Relations to Other Patterns:

Overall Understandability:

Clear Problem Description:

Clear Relevance and Consequences:

Clear Figures and Illustrations:

Missing Information:

Posted: 2009-09-11 Last modified: 2009/09/11

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 |RevisionID=5799
 |Score=0 - needs major revision
-|ReviewSummary=This pattern is meant to be used to represent group memberships of concepts. Sub and super groups can be represented, and both extensional (declared) and intensional (according to a property) memberships can be modeled.
+|ReviewText=This pattern is meant to be used to represent group memberships of concepts. Sub and super groups can be represented, and both extensional (declared) and intensional (according to a property) memberships can be modeled.
 The pattern seems interesting but present many shadowed areas. I can deduce from the usage of the terms concept ans broader/narrower relations that this pattern is to be used together with the SKOS vocabulary. If this is the case this should be made explicit. Otherwise, what is the relation of this pattern with owl ?