EnricoDaga (Talk | contribs) (Article updated via HTTP request) |
(Article updated via HTTP request) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
* the user enter data and creates the reference | * the user enter data and creates the reference | ||
* all references are automatically listed at the bottom of the page</noinclude> | * all references are automatically listed at the bottom of the page</noinclude> | ||
| + | <noinclude>=====26-02-2010 [[User:MichaelUschold]] says:===== | ||
| + | This is close to what we want. I propose the following changes: | ||
| + | # There should not be a distinction between a WebReference and Other reference. Instead | ||
| + | ## just have one kind of reference | ||
| + | ## have an optional URL field in the case of it being a web reference. | ||
| + | ## in the case of a non-web reference, everything that is needed will be in the ReferenceDescription (e.g. a reference for a paper in a conference proceedings). Often papers have URLs too the .pdf. | ||
| + | # Having OWL/RDF Ontology as a type of reference will be redundant for patterns and exemplary ontologies, and modeling issues where there already are properties for this (e.g. OWLImplemntation and OntologyURI). For types of references, I think having OWL/RDF Ontology is unnecessary. We already have properties for things called OWLImplementation, and OntologyURI. I'm not sure we need a type for ontology at all. | ||
| + | # The types of references will therefore include: | ||
| + | ## Project Home Page (instead of Project Web Site - small difference) | ||
| + | ## Documentation | ||
| + | ## Wiki | ||
| + | ## Discussion Forum (e.g. a link to a discussion thread) | ||
| + | ## Personal Communication (this may not be necessary, may not get much use) | ||
| + | ## Other | ||
| + | # Have a "Add Another Reference Type" button, in case there is a commonly occurring option missed.</noinclude> | ||
Title: References for Exemplary Tasks
Description: Currently, there is no good way for users to enter references with links and information about them. This is really a big deal, references are very important for this catalogue to be useful. Needs to have a solution that allows entering text as well as a link and to have them in a nice table. May also want a longer text description than a link name. May want a reference type too.
Sub-tasks: This task has no sub-tasks
We can give the possibility to add references in the following way:
The workflow ca be:
This is close to what we want. I propose the following changes:
'Ontology Design Patterns'